I’ve questioned the attitude of Burgess before and after a flying comeback this year, he’s gone backwards since the new deal was signed and I can’t say I’m surprised. He’s so so talented but he just doesn’t look to have the desire to be the best player he can be.

Frustrating

We seem to be in a perpetual 'transitional season' over recent years.

We won it last year.

So who will replace Burgess next week?
Hankinson to centre and Sarginson to wing with Marshall going to 5?

And ?

Every season there is a coming and going of players....mainly going, especially any class. Tonight showed us where we are ........you might have enjoyed that. But I certainly didn't.

Spot on. The head in the sand approach must end soon surely.

That's all true, NK, but it's like you only mentioned the good bits!

French?

He reminds me of Charnley is so many ways, including his attitude and half hearted efforts now he’s become billy big .

It's a footnote now, but does anyone agree with us going for 2 when we were 6-2 down near their line? I thought it was a waste of field position, still left us needing to score and basically said to an already-confident Saints "We don't think we can score a try even from here."

In hindsight no but at the time I think it was the right decision, get the 2 and continue to build pressure. I think most teams would have gone for the 2 to be totally honest

Completely agree. It’s easy to forget their age when the way they are playing is far beyond their age and experience.

In hindsight, Wigan should of known it wouldn't work as Wire did it 3 times last week and still lost.....

Thought that was a dreadful decision that gave a really poor message.

Both Wire and Wigan in recent weeks have told the Saints defence they think it is too strong for them early on in games.

It wasn't the right decision. But we wouldn't have scored.