I don't think there will began uproar when Rocky goes given how he is being treated in relation to opportunities.

Young players are great some teams need young players to freshen the squad up, we don't at this stage, we need experience and leaders in the pack and you don't find that in the youth system.

We need to utilise duel reg/loan options for these lads on the cusp of coming through, get some real game time at SL level to see if they can cut it before they step up to Wigan first team level.

I think looking who has already been signed we could have brought stop gap experienced players in for next year without compromising junior development utilising duel reg/loans in our favour.

A number of SL clubs have been crying out to loan some of our young fringe players but instead they go unused at Wigan.

It's obviously a fine balancing act and you're right about potential uproar. I don't want wholesale changes but I do believe we're in desperate need if a big, experienced prop. He would help guide lads like Bretherton who I agree is a superb prospect. He is a fabulous size for a young prop but I still wouldn't want to throw him in on a regular basis alongside our current set of props.

I agree. I don't think we're actually too bad IF we have Lockers and Joel in the back row as that does give us some size and Lockers has that ability be run like a prop, second row or be a ball handler. The problem is of course we can't rely on his fitness for more than 60 - 70 % of the games.

I'd like to see Bretherton used a bit like Ryan Sutton has this year, a couple of games played than rested or dual reg'd for few. A big rough prop would be a handy acquisition though.

To answer Jonh. We have put a lot of the younger players out on loan/dual reg this season. Logan Tomkins to Salford, Burke and Greenwood to HKR all on loan. Then Tierney, Doran, Connor Farrell, Powell etc have all been used on dual reg at Workington. I'm guessing we'll have to do the same next year.

Hampshire has had quite a few games this year, I was hoping for around 15 - 20 but he is in a strange/unique position as being a very valuable squad member and back up for #1, #6 and even #7 and there haven't been many injuries in those areas to date.

Iv seen enough of ryan over the years to know how good he is at half and what qualities he's got and he ain't no full back he needs his hands on the ball. Just play him or please let him go. Biggest regret of my life taking him to wigan. It's a short career let him go and have one.

Its a strange one with rocky. Next season could we not go with of a 1-7 of:

1. Sam t
2. Charnley
3. Gelling
4. Sarg
5. Manfredi
6. Rocky
7. Williams

As other have said we are crying out for an experienced prop/ pack leader because atm our pack isnt good enough to protect a potential 1-7 like i named above.

I can't see us recruiting anyone else for next season ,we'll have Sam to replace Bowen and Manfredi will replace Budgie and obviously Larne will go back other than that I think we'll have the same squad as this season

You have to get the balance right if players are out there to improve your squad sign them. If players are already in your system and ready to improve the team promote them.

The needs of our team are fairly obvious and we are not going to get that internally for next year.

We can't chase rainbows on the hope these young players will all make it at Wigan as invariably they will not.

Players leave clubs and go on to have good careers. You don't see Leeds moaning about losing Kyle Amor for example. Great Prop but Leeds strengthened and let him go.

How many of the juniors are apart from Rocky are/will be ready for regular first team within 2 years?

Woah, woah, woah - do you not know how the internet works?

We've "missed out" on every player signed by another club, doubly so if they were signed by a rival. If we were actually trying to sign them or not is immaterial to the debate.

Every signing we've "missed out" on (see above) "will come back to haunt us".

Interesting just listening to lenagan on wigan tv:

Millwall was chosen instead of qpr and fulham because QPR was 3x more expensive and fulham was 5x more expensive

I'm all for investing in youth and he quoted williams and rocky as examples but whats the point of mentioning rocky when he isnt being played?

Recruitment said wigan spend right upto the cap..might just be me reading into to but we may be in for afew more "project signings"

I've made my mind up we've got a team built on the cheap scenario. It's going to bite us in the sooner rather than later and two seasons without a pot will underpin that because I sure can't see us winning owt this year I'm afraid.

Sorry, but I was being sarcastic........ I don't understand why we just don't buy every player whose available... I wish I was a Leeds fan

So what do you advocate?

Say nothing until the night before the first game of next season so we definitely know who we have/haven't signed? Would we then be allowed to comment on our transfer policy.

Also how is it now ok to be in the mix for players but never land one? It's like Saint Pats saying they were trying to sign Paul Gallen but offered him a pack of space raiders and a few pints after the match. Sadly they didn't get him but at least they put thier name in the hat eh.

Until I'm doing the buying, I'll wait to see what happens.... We are already signing the best player to come to the SL from the NRL..... I'll reserve judgement until I see the full roster for next season... Till then it's all opinion and supposition..... I'm sure many on here would be much happier supporting a team like Wakefield, apologises to Wakefield fans, then they could be really miserable...

i would love to have rocky at the rhinos and there's definitely going to be more opportunities to make a spot there his own than he is going to get at wigan
i'm pretty sure that we were after your lad whilst he was playing for normanton,if so why did he/you choose wigan?

I've decided to embrace the internet and panic like mad because it's 7 months until the start of next season.