Quote: Rogues Gallery "There is a higher revenue return with less costs for £22 x 13K (£286K) than for
£11 x 25K (£275K) so I'll take the 13K option please.
You're not doing maths or accountancy at Uni are you?'"
I was meant to do £12.
I am doing a sports marketing degree.
Even so, I think our sport needs to take risks by making these events bigger. The long term benefits of making semi-finals a huge event in RL would far outweigh the benefits of an extra £11k profit.
I understand you are trying to patronise me as you do with most people, added to your classic "I said this months ago, here is a link"...... BTW staring Tommy turned out to be the best option... glad we didn't start McIlorum
. Good RL brain over big hitters every time.
To be honest, nobody cares Rogues. All I care about is RL getting better and bigger. Small time semi-finals do nothing for the game. I would rather see the long term benefits of getting more and more people watching the game.
This now sounds like I am 'having a dig' or 'taking the micky', I am not, I respect your views, you clearly know a lot about RL and have seen the game develop from its very early years
but I am not posting to show my business plan for the RFL to use. If you want to have a dig at some 20 year old lads then I suggest you go down to Wigan Park at all the yobs who ARE NOT trying to better themselves. I am quite aware of 'COSTS' but like I said, I am not on here to to a detailed business plan.
Finally if you actually disagree with the idea of moving to bigger stadiums with cheaper tickets then thats fine but I don't see how anyone could as long as the sport was making a similar amount of money. Maybe you are just being 'Rogues'