My gut feeling from reading the charge summary is that Sam will get a 2 game suspension.

Godwin got 3, and had the temerity to plead not guilty, but they both ran in and invloved themselves in something they shouldn't have.

Depends on what the decisions are. If both Sam and Joel are banned then we've got a better chance of getting Joel's overturned on appeal than we do with Sam. I think Sam is the more likely to be banned and the more likely to get the longest ban.

Another one with a very vivid imagination, he was spoken to once and that was the on report incident.

Whats a grade B offence in terms of matches ban ?

The "Coley" report makes me laugh. It says "dangerous contact,58th min on Fitzgibbon".
It goes on "Player grips around ball and chest, not neck,no crusher or unnaceptable risk of injury, penalty sufficient". After reading that it should have said "penalty incorrect".

I've always called Fergie an idiot after what he used to say about protecting Ronaldo etc but to effectively condone what Manu did to Tomkins is ludicrous. For a player to be assaulted about 3 times during a match then be the one that faces a ban just shows how amateurish the RFL really are and that doesn't help when we want to make ourselves a more attractive prospect than union.

You are both wrong. He was spoken to twice, the second incident was put on report.

One to two matches.

Cheers

Ah another "All the world is against us" Wiganer. If there had been anything in the tackles you mention it would have come out in the disciplinary - it hasn't so there wasn't. To call them assaults because your star man is tackled hard does nothing but embarrass you. Don't keep being fooled by conman Tomkins rolling about the floor like a pussyballer. He's the biggest play actor in the league bar none.

If that is the case I apologise, what/when was the first incident.

So you think the RFL get everything right all the time?