FORUMS > Wigan Warriors > Team for Cas |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2795 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2011 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: post "We spend a boat load of money on Hastings, also sign the player he formed a partnership with last season in Bibby and then split them to accommodate a young player. No. If we are to play another halfback with Hastings then they have to make way, not Hastings.
Having Bibby and Hastings together is more solid defensively because they trust each other, whereas Bibby was coming across Smith as Smith isn’t as good in defence as Hastings and Bibby was coming in trying to defend for him, we can’t have that, teams will just try and have their second rowers run all over Smith so that Bibby starts coming across then after a few times ping the ball out wide.'"
Can’t defend Bibby a single ounce for that missed tackle. He and Smith were soft and both got it horribly wrong and neither can be excused for such a poor attempt. Hankinson would have never missed that tackle.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3076_1671446335.jpg SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3076.jpg |
|
| I think the defence has been good so far this season. Wigan have only conceded three tries and two of those have been poor individual efforts. That should have been good enough to win both games.
It's the attack and poor discipline that has been most disappointing.
I always believe that defence is a team thing whereas tackling is an individual thing.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1081 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2022 | Aug 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: nottinghamtiger "Whilst I don’t watch Wigan regularly (bar TV games), I did notice that Wigan seemed to have no set plays or patterns of play. You’ve got the likes of French and Hastings, and not once did they offer the threat of a set play together. I can’t remember seeing Hastings trying to find French once in the entire 80 minutes.
I’m just not sure what Wigan do in training, if there isn’t any evidence of combinations or pre-planned moves on game-day. That comes down to coaching.'"
Its been like this for ages. I brought it up in the off season and asked why not look back at some of the past moves of the 90s and fit them into the modern game when the time is right. I was shouted down, told that you can only play modern RL to set structure that must not be strayed from. Garbage i say, they are trying to over complicate a simple issue of confusing defenders because thats what it boils down to be in 1992 or 2020.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2983 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
icons15f0_files/3441-1022jacare-msnicons.jpg :icons15f0_files/3441-1022jacare-msnicons.jpg |
|
| Quote: Rogues Gallery "I think the defence has been good so far this season. Wigan have only conceded three tries and two of those have been poor individual efforts. That should have been good enough to win both games.
It's the attack and poor discipline that has been most disappointing.
I always believe that defence is a team thing whereas tackling is an individual thing.'"
Apologies Rogues but grinding out wins with good defence isn't what Lam has promised for the last 15 months.
Also I think adjectives stronger than disappointing are also necessary. We've played one man rugby with incessant inside balls every game. Fans debate on which 2 to pick from Manfredi, Marshall and Burgess and I just smile. Marshall has had 2 passes in 2 games. Burgess a similar number. I'm not a statistician but I'd have a guess that our wingers scored fewer tries last year than in any year in at least the last decade.
I'm angry not disappointed that with a relatively healthy squad and with decent acquisitions of French and Hastings I'm watching a style of rugby that frankly is pretty dire.
I'm tired of hearing not disappointed that the coach once again can only blame the players after the Cas game with zero reference to his input to the game. He states "we didn't play to the plan", "our discipline was poor" which he can effect and if he were a coach be able to rectify quite easily.
I'm bored not disappointed of hearing "training went well". As a few have said since his tenure we have zero style or structure so I don't know what "training went well" means.
If we had lost 16-12 to say the 2017 Cas team last Friday I would have been disappointed but could have taken it on the chin but losing to a pretty much decimated 2019 Cas team with hardly a sniff of rugby or fight just drives me crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15453 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
[quote="Frank Zappa":1sacjrvf]Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.[/quote:1sacjrvf]
[quote="The_Enforcer":1sacjrvf]Most idiotic post ever goes to Grimmy..... The way to restart should be an arm wrestle between a designated player from each side.[/quote:1sacjrvf]: |
|
| Quote: The_Enforcer "Its been like this for ages. I brought it up in the off season and asked why not look back at some of the past moves of the 90s and fit them into the modern game when the time is right. People broadly agreed we could take inspiration from the past, whilst recognising defences are tougher now due to advances in conditioning. I then started banging on about how everything was better in my day, then spat my dummy when different views were expressed.'"
Fixed that for ya
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2088 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2009 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Nov 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Watching the extended highlights on Wigan TV it doesn't look like our attack was lacking ideas, it looks like it was a case of poor execution in a close game, plus a little bit of bad luck at times. A couple of breaks that we made you would expect to lead to tries - such as the Burgess break where he flung the ball back inside over French's head. The Farrell break where he should have passed inside to Smith but threw it in touch behind Burgess. Smith's inside pass to French on the last and the kick through to Burgess was a well worked move.
I'm willing to wait a couple more games to see whether we see much improvement in attack. We always tend to come into the season with less game time under our belts than most teams and it can lead to a slow start.
I think our biggest issue compared to other teams is that most sides put on good attacking moves off the back of a dominant carry and quick play the ball. I'm not sure our forwards have been able to give us the best opportunity to do that so far. There are a few subtleties to making good carries and getting quick play the ball that I think come with experience. In form I think Flower and Bullock could add a lot to this side.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 32357 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
3076_1671446335.jpg SAINTS THE ORIGINAL AND PERENNIAL CHEATS
For sale full Saints kit (circa 1989). Shirts in pristine condition, but shorts badly soiled.
For 27 - 0 you get a trophy
For 75 - 0 you get sod all.
Wigan had eight in a row
Saints have five in a row:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3076.jpg |
|
| Quote: Cherry.Pie "Watching the extended highlights on Wigan TV it doesn't look like our attack was lacking ideas, it looks like it was a case of poor execution in a close game, plus a little bit of bad luck at times. A couple of breaks that we made you would expect to lead to tries - such as the Burgess break where he flung the ball back inside over French's head. The Farrell break where he should have passed inside to Smith but threw it in touch behind Burgess. Smith's inside pass to French on the last and the kick through to Burgess was a well worked move.
I'm willing to wait a couple more games to see whether we see much improvement in attack. We always tend to come into the season with less game time under our belts than most teams and it can lead to a slow start.
I think our biggest issue compared to other teams is that most sides put on good attacking moves off the back of a dominant carry and quick play the ball. I'm not sure our forwards have been able to give us the best opportunity to do that so far. There are a few subtleties to making good carries and getting quick play the ball that I think come with experience. In form I think Flower and Bullock could add a lot to this side.'"
What did you think about the Bibby no try decision? I also want to see the obstruction calls, one of which I think would have led to a try. The first Havard penalty looked harsh and I think the Cas player was offside on the final play of the game (cherry and white specs on)
edit
I've just watched it again and Bibby definitely scores. Even if that's not given, the Cas player kicks the ball over the dead ball line and it's a goal line dropout, NOT a 20 metre tap which is what was given.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 4470 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
69704_1656949802.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_69704.jpg |
|
| Quote: Rogues Gallery "What did you think about the Bibby no try decision? I also want to see the obstruction calls, one of which I think would have led to a try. The first Havard penalty looked harsh and I think the Cas player was offside on the final play of the game (cherry and white specs on)'"
Not sure which penalty it was I'll have to watch again, but the crowd appeals with the usual "ooooo" shout and the ref responds but it's across the chest.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 7648 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
17555_1637667680.png Wigan RLFC:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_17555.png |
|
| Quote: Rogues Gallery "What did you think about the Bibby no try decision? I also want to see the obstruction calls, one of which I think would have led to a try. The first Havard penalty looked harsh and I think the Cas player was offside on the final play of the game (cherry and white specs on)
edit
I've just watched it again and Bibby definitely scores. Even if that's not given, the Cas player kicks the ball over the dead ball line and it's a goal line dropout, NOT a 20 metre tap which is what was given.'"
Funny how the Bibby No Try isn't included in the official Super League highlights reel...
Was the knock on that lead to the 2nd Cas Try the correct call? Looked like he hit the arm, not the ball from where we were standing.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2833 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2022 | Apr 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: The_Enforcer "Its been like this for ages. I brought it up in the off season and asked why not look back at some of the past moves of the 90s and fit them into the modern game when the time is right. I was shouted down, told that you can only play modern RL to set structure that must not be strayed from. Garbage i say, they are trying to over complicate a simple issue of confusing defenders because thats what it boils down to be in 1992 or 2020.'"
So many tries in the modern game involve the full-back coming into the attacking line on one edge or the other. They are either directly involved in play by receiving the ball and creating an over-lap for the outside backs, or indirectly involved by creating indecision in the defensive line and creating space for others.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2983 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2008 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
icons15f0_files/3441-1022jacare-msnicons.jpg :icons15f0_files/3441-1022jacare-msnicons.jpg |
|
| Quote: Rogues Gallery "What did you think about the Bibby no try decision? I also want to see the obstruction calls, one of which I think would have led to a try. The first Havard penalty looked harsh and I think the Cas player was offside on the final play of the game (cherry and white specs on)
edit
I've just watched it again and Bibby definitely scores. Even if that's not given, the Cas player kicks the ball over the dead ball line and it's a goal line dropout, NOT a 20 metre tap which is what was given.'"
The disallowed try was right in front of us and for me it was a try. At one point I thought the TJ had indicated that it was a try.
We had other opportunities that we flunked miserably though
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1196 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Sep 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
"Stand by me as I stand by you, be brave and dare to dream".: |
|
| Never ceases to amaze me on RLfans, how many disallowed tries we’re “right in front of me”.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1081 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2022 | Aug 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Grimmy "Fixed that for ya'"
You've never fixed or been right about anything in your life.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1081 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2022 | Aug 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: nottinghamtiger "So many tries in the modern game involve the full-back coming into the attacking line on one edge or the other. They are either directly involved in play by receiving the ball and creating an over-lap for the outside backs, or indirectly involved by creating indecision in the defensive line and creating space for others.'"
Im not disputing that but who says all teams must stick to this kind of play? Why not mix it up so that the opposition have no idea what kind of play you are going to run next?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 15453 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2024 | Nov 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
[quote="Frank Zappa":1sacjrvf]Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.[/quote:1sacjrvf]
[quote="The_Enforcer":1sacjrvf]Most idiotic post ever goes to Grimmy..... The way to restart should be an arm wrestle between a designated player from each side.[/quote:1sacjrvf]: |
|
| Quote: Rogues Gallery "What did you think about the Bibby no try decision? I also want to see the obstruction calls, one of which I think would have led to a try. The first Havard penalty looked harsh and I think the Cas player was offside on the final play of the game (cherry and white specs on)
edit
I've just watched it again and Bibby definitely scores. Even if that's not given, the Cas player kicks the ball over the dead ball line and it's a goal line dropout, NOT a 20 metre tap which is what was given.'"
Just watched the no try back. Looks to me like he's grounded it on the deadball line, hence the 20m tap. Fine margins.
First obstruction - Isa stops in the line, as soon as Lockers passes it's a penalty. Either Isa needs to get through the gap, or Lockers needs to surrender. We get given a soft penalty on the next set, Isa then ruins it by getting penalised in possession for slapping a Cas player. Massive one that, stupid.
Second obstruction also correct, Farrell stops in the line.
You're right about Cas being offside at the end. We should have had a penalty and needed to do a 'wide to West'. Daft decision to spend time taking the conversion, we have the right to elect not to take it, and the clock would have gone off straight away.
Overall we were our own worst enemies in that game. Over eagerness in defence led to three offside penalties. Three high tackles. A shoulder charge. Penalised in possession for striking. Marched 10 metres for dissent. You can't do that on a short pitch and expect to win the game. Constantly gave ourselves hard work to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|