Well, seeing as he's in charge of the referees I'd say it proves quite a lot...

Hopefully we'll be on the right side of a VR decision come next Saturday to balance it out

not got a board of you're own to play on? Best make the most of it, if ticket sales are anything to go by, we'll be taking over half of your board soon.

Maybe it just proves Cummings doesn't understand the rules of what constitutes a knock on.
See previous post - as proved by the video replays Sam knocking Mcguire's arm forced him to drop the ball. It was not an intentional drop kick or even a deliberate grubber kick where the player kicks the ball on the half-volley for better control.

Leeds were unlucky as without the VR the try may well have been given - having said that the touch judge noticed the "knock on" which is why Alibert went to the VR in the first place.

TBH this is where Leeds may have a genuine grievance as the try would probably have been given if the game had not been televised/had a VR. We've had numerous discussions about this in recent months/years.....!

Oh dear Lord NO !

IMHO he/Bentham, is the only thing that can stop us from hoisting the Cup aloft.

Hells teeth, who rattled your cage?

What has ticket sales got to do with what I was saying?

Correct, I've seen the red cabbage stains on his shirt.

Cummings being the man whose job it is to judge whether it was the correct decision saying it wasnt the correct decision kind of proves it wasnt the correct decision.

Whilst your interpretation of the rules states it was a knock on, the man whose job it is to interpret the rules disagrees. Technically it wasnt a knock on, we know this because we have been told so.

Doesnt quite fit with Wigan being hard done by does it?