The problem I have is the letter of the law would have meant it would be a penalty to Wire if turned down which would have been a farce considering it's the refs error. If the try got turned down the game should have just gone back to Carmont playing the ball but it wouldn't have and that's the issue.

I'm not sure you can see where we're all coming from. Like I originally said, if Carmont was tackled but got the nod to play on, he is in a lose lose situation. Take himback to the play the ball would be the best decision but wouldn't happen.

If you actually listen to the ref, you can hear from his ear piece, the video ref says "but you said play on", but he asked to look anyway.
A bloody shambles if you ask me!

once refs made a play on decision he shouldnt be allowed to ask video ref if he was correct.

take cricket......ump gives LBW......he cant ask if he was right, but player might if review systems there.

BUT......if hes in doubt about a run out, he goes for the screen, similar to video ref in our spor, to check if a try is a try??
neither should be allowed to challenge their own decisions.

I remember that

I agree with the OPThe Referee judges on matters of fact and shall not subsequently alter those judgments. He may cancel any decision made if prior foul play of which he had no knowledge is reported to him by a Touch Judge.'"

Pace on Coley though.. like a train.

By a Loose Forward

Who started on the other side of the pitch.

As soon as he caught it, I looked over quick and Lockers was already on his tracks.

Great stuff from the skipper to make that effort, especially being a forward - also thumbs up to Sam for making it back too.

On a separate note, I was glad they didn't score for Finch. Just started to get the fans approval and he could have cost us the game.