Again tho it’s the Wigan club that will feel this the hardest not Hock as if he’s to thick to realise in the first place the opportunity he had he never will.

As I’ve said through no fault of their own Wigan are going to have to sack one of our leading players and we aren’t going to get anything back from all the investment we’ve put into him.

Where is the justice when Hock goes to another team after his ban and scores a few tries against us!!!

The system is against the clubs and not the players and we lose out either way when it’s a player of Hocks talent.

He he.

I hope not tbh.

11-New second rower or Hansen
12-J Tomkins
13-O'Loughlin

bench spot-Hansen/Mossop/Flanagan/Farrell

we could use Baileys/Hocks money to get a top line prop out of a deal and re-sign Coley on a one year deal going in with a big front row and the possibility of Coley filling in at second row.

Looks likely, but I still think we would be alrite with Hansen, Tomkins, Flanagan and Mossop.

I do get the feeling that in time - something good may come out of this in respect of the Wigan club.

Cocaine is classed as performance enhancing.

And your club will be first knocking on his door. All moral will be thrown out the window when the time comes that a international class player is up for grabs.

Carry on we can bring a few of your players up if you would like?

What cheese's me off the most is that i've now got to go home and explain this c*** to my 8yr old now

the A and B sample are taken at the same time. If the A sample is postivie, they do a different more stringent test on the B sample.

Depends which girls you speak to.

Well it hasn't worked