Damn right. Radford got fook all and Sam did no worse than he did.

The only time someone appealed this year his ban was extended. I'd rather him miss Hudds and be definitely able to play vs Wire than chance them extending it. Plus you can only appeal that he didnt do it. He definitely did so theres no point.

You did before the new Chairman/ owner took over.

pretty irrelevant post

Both deserve their ban so I don't know why anyone would suggest Wigan should appeal. What do you expect if your going to run over and throw punches. One game really isn't too bad imo.

We did plenty of "other things" as well before then as well.

"Due to his exceptional record" makes it sound like he's guilty but he's been a good boy before now so we'll let him off the hook.

Disagree with that.

Even from being a young lad i was taught to run the ball in, if i had just been smashed, hit high, punched etc.

Its the way it has always been

It must have been my imagination when Fitzgibbon was throwing punches then.

Which coincidentally is the exact same record as Joels, 1 previous charge each

Murphy of Wakey had his 2 game ban reduced to just a fine on appeal and Webster of Hull KR had his two game ban kept as it was on appeal.

Due to him being a midget, the RFL didnt see it.

Correct! And if possible run at the player who just hit you, in the hope of gaining another pen and possibly the sin-binning or dismissal of the opponent.

Joel Tomkins was just simply too thick to think he was being given a free shot.

Well Lima didn't have a record as he hadn't played any games in Superleague before whereas Radford has had many years in Superleague so has built up a clean record. Pretty simple really.