Nope, but the fact that all three have three times (or more) the assists that Gleeson has is a decent indicator, especially given one of them has spent a lot of time on the wing.

We wouldn't have won more. Bad influence in the dressing room, incorrect attitude etc.

Wire trophy count with Gleeson - 0
Wire trophy count without Gleeson - 2

Wigan trophy count with - 0 (for now)
Wigan trophy count without - 0

Facts speak for themselves. Although as somebody said previously both parties are happy.

Lies, damn lies and statistics.

Gleeson has been integral to Wigan's success this season, not just in attack but also in defence, and I wouldn't take any of Wire's centres ahead of him.

But as I said before, neither I, nor the Wire lad, nor you, are in a position to appreciate the full performance of each other's players, so it's a pointless attempt at point-scoring, if such a thing is possible.

Edited for accuracy. It's a small point, but I'm sure you wouldn't want to get a reputation for having a selective memory when it comes to facts that speak for themsleves.

But Wigan are top and Warrington are 3rd therefore logic suggests all our players are better than all your players

The problem there is that doesn't take into account the teams plays, e.g. we throw a cut out pass to Goulding a LOT on that side that keeps Gleeson's assist numbers far lower than they would be.

Attack definitely but I'm not so sure about defense, he's not the strongest defender IMO. I'd definitely take King and Atkins ahead of him, not too sure about Bridge.

No, but as fans we all have opinions, which is why this message board exists. I'm sure in your time you have decided player A is better than player B without having watched every game they play.

Why you think it's point scoring I have no idea, you get very defensive at the most minor discussions

Not at all.

If you wanna grasp at that then that's fair enough.