You think Foster has a lot more to his game than Charnley but you still havent told us what?

i think foster showed last night why he doesnt take too many scoots hits up out of his own half!! no where near good enough and that was my whole point from the start! look at the difference from charnley and richards on bringing the ball back to foster(for when he was on!)

IMO the best young winger at Saints is Makinson, far better prospect than Foster.

Don't know about anybody else but I was far more nervous when Eastmond came on for him. He is not a dangerous carrier of the ball at all. Offers very little threat at all.

Me too. You know what to expect from Foster - he's a decent fast winger. Eastmond's a tricky bugger when he wants to be.

Cant believe Foster missed half the game because of a cut! Soft lad.

He was probably arguing with the physio,
"Don't put the bandage on, it'll mess my hair up"

i think it was because he had blood in his eye and he needed docs orders to clear his sight etc

I would imagine it takes more than five minutes to stem blood and put in 17 stitches. Plus he might have been woozy given that the injury was on his head. Either way, he came back on and played once he'd been sorted. I'd say there was nothing soft about that.

Woooooooossssssssssssssshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!

Regardless of Eastmond not having any heart or all his injury issues, he is still one of those players where as an opposition fan you panic like anything when he's got the ball in his hands. Foster, is not.