Nothing. But it was you who brought this up

And to that extent I agree with you. Based purely on results we've not missed him.

Based on how the squad has performed, that's open to interpretation, and the majority would seem to indicate that we have.

In the future, try to refrain from making massively sweeping statements about a player (who is very popular amongst the fans) and his contribution to the squad, and then not expecting to have your head bitten off.

We're done here.

Cheers for the tip. I usually expected a more intelligent response from people which doesn't always happen.

Thank you for providing decent discussion without any abuse.

All done.

I dont think we've missed him, because we have a good squad.
HOWEVER I do believe that we would have been a stronger team with him in, and that he is a far superior player to Chris Tuson.

Hansen hasn't been missed as we have lost zero games in his absence

Hansen has been picked in the starting XIII in every game except one when he has been available for selection.

Seeing that second row is probably our strongest position squad wise that would suggest that the coaching staff rate HH very highly.

12 pages
Have we missed Fielden and Gleeson?
Would we have won any more games with them? Maybe.
Would we have lost any more games with them? Probably not.
So good riddance to Gleeson? No, I'd have him back like a shot.
So get rid of the high-earner that is Fielden? I think not.
HH deserves his place in the 13, I believe we are weaker without him, although full respect to the other squad players, so, yes, he has been missed.

Pengy i know who you are and hope what i have heared is true but paaaaat is the best player on the team like it or not

what does that mean?hope whats true? and sorry i disagree. sam tomkins is the best player on our team!

that you are really the love-child of mal meninga and alex murphy and ready to join the club to fill in as centre/stand-off ????

Hansen will get back in the team when back with tuson the one dropping out. Our 3 second rowers this year are definately hoffman,hansen and farrell. With farrell being outstanding so far and hoffman showing why he is world class hansen is going to need to come into the team and show some very good form to keep his place. Especially with Hock coming back in less than a month he may find his place under threat!

However, what a dilemma for the coaching staff to have. Tuson who has done nothing wrong since coming into the first team and Jack Hughes who has also shown significant promise fighting to get into the first team squad.

What a line up and inparticular pack we could have in the time for the warrington game!

S.Tomkins, Charnley, J.Tomkins, Carmont, Richards, Finch, Leuluai, Fielden, McIllorum, Mossop, Hoffman, Hansen, O'Loughlin subs Hock, Prescott/Lima/Coley, Farrell, Deacon

I'd hate to be the person given the dilemma of chosing that 4th prop! I suppose it will benefit us in the long run though because of squad rotation. The only definate starter in the front row is Mossop! He has been fantastic this year.

As I have said previously, I think Liam Farrells form has dipped a little, particularly those long attacking runs that he was previously making. This maybe the fact that he is being used in the starting XIII, and is having to do a lot more of the "unsung" defensive work that HH does.

I got told your down at the academy