If ever there's a case for "sending off sufficient", this is it.

Forget that, 3 matches, wonder if we can borrow Saints appeals guy

I predicted 2.

Would be interested to read the reasoning.

"Reckless, player tried to tackle, reckless about outcome"

Wow!

Debatable red but I can live with that but 3 games is astonishing. I’ lost with it all, I really am.

Wonder if his previous record counted against him, still not sure what he was supposed to do in the split second he had to react,

That's just nuts. I'm not going to argue about the sending off as it's interpretation at the end of the day but 3 games for that? What next? 1 game for tying your shoelaces too tight?

Anyway....onwards and upwards. I hope we use the availability of his place to blood one of our young academy props as there's a few real contenders in there.

could we borrow Leeds' appeals guy instead?

Well it didn't count against Bentley and one or two others.

Here you are mate, a bag of e.


Case Number:
ON/1207/22

Brad Singleton #8, Wigan
Competition:
Super League

Match:
St Helens v Wigan Warriors

Match Date:
2022-07-09

Incident:
High Tackle

Decision:
Charge

Charge Detail:
Law 15.1(b) – High Tackle

Reckless – tried to tackle but reckless about outcome.

Grade C

Sanctions:
3 Match Penalty Notice

Are these kind of decisions being made in the NRL?

I just think the whole thing is very harsh. I get the reasoning, direct contact with shoulder to head.

I think context has to be taken into account though. Singleton was going in to make a tackle, field gets there first and the Sironen’s position then changes, he starts to go down. Singleton can’t pull out or adjust quickly enough and makes contact. Without Field’s involvement it’s a good tackle. That been seems to have been ignored.