If you aren't dominate in the tackle then you don't deserve extra time lying on. Thankfully Ganson is a ref that gets that.

Huddersfield knew they had to slow us down early on and Ganson saw what they were trying.

The one thing that gets me with our game is how we can change an interpretation with a particular law. It isn't the first time a new directives has been sent out part way through a season or in this case 95% of the way through. Fans, coaches and players all complain about consistency, how the hell do you get consistency by changing something mid season?

Hudds were doing just that last night and got penalised for it. However I do think Bentham will be more lenient with you lot. Next time we meet however me may have a different ref who will penalise. It's a case of wait and see who we get.

During the weekly rounds Ganson usually lets the game flow, but in big games he increasingly seems to think we've all come to see him. A combination of the game already won and Ganson's mug on the screen every minute, meant I turned over and watched the cricket after 25 minutes.

the english refs should take a look at the aussie play off games, you would hardly notice the ref and they have two.

I've said it for a while now, its not just Ganson but a lot of referees are ruining a lot of games. Their consistant whistle blowing does make me change channels. A lot of tries only come from piggy backs down the field. If it were a penalty then definately no complaints. But if it was 15 - 6 penalty count they would always seem to try and even it up towards the end.

Looks to me on form like a Warrington - Wigan in the Grand Final. Guess who the ref is likely to be.... Bentham already having had the CC final.

I agree with that; the more a crowd or team question his decisions Ganson sticks to his guns even if he his wrong. He loves the limelight; a couple of dodgy penalties for high shots with players slipping before contact, the penalty againt Brough for the shot on Hodgson was harsh.

I thought the game was ruined as a contest after 20 min. Wire deserved the win the Giants look like no threat to any of the top three and I would be suprised if they win a play off game.

last night was beyond a joke. The worst thing is full time refs. They have 80 mins to justify their livelihood and make the most of there moment in the sun.

I very rarely criticize referees but I could hardly believe what I was watching yesterday. The first two penalties (the supposed high shot by Morley and the imagined interference on Hodgson) were just ludicrous, never penalties by (I would have presumed) anybody's yardstick. Like a lot of people, I stopped watching very early because of that but on a positive note, I have to say that Riley's finish for his first try was cracking, a proper winger's finish.

I'll not take anything away from wire who played well but giants might have scored a few more points if the game had been allowed to flow.

Things don't even themselves up in sport. Of course we can all select forward passes that our team and the opposition have got away with but things definitely do not even themselves up. The laws of probability only occur with things like tossing coins and selecting cards. They always 'almost' even up. If you toss a coin 500 times the result will probably be 260 to 240 but not 250 each.

Not going to argue semantics with you. but you have said what i have, just that they will not even up to 50/50 more 49/51. I don't even know why you wasted your time.

There have been some poor Friday night games which I have sat through but last night was the first time that I decided enough was enough. Turned over at half time and didn't bother putting it back on. No complaints about Wire but the(how can you describe him without swearing) in the middle was a disgrace