Who's selection though?


I bet he is in Maguires and thats the one that counts. It'll be interesting to see what everyones starting pack and bench would be when everyone is available. Mine would be-

Fielden
McIlorum
Coley
Hansen
Hoffman
O'Loughlin

subs
Lima
Mossop
Hock
Farrell

Paul Prescott the unlucky man for me at the moment and thats with us playing four forwards on the bench(which may not happen). In that side we'd have to shift Lockers to 6 and Faz to 13 when Leuluai goes into hooker but that worked well last season and that pack of forwards would be relentless going at the opposition.

I'm a huge Farrel fan as are most Wigan fans. But I'd love to see him develop a passing game. It's a big thing missing from his game IMO. If he's to be the player that replaces Lockers at 13 it's something he's going to have work on.

I'd pick the same pack as NickyKiss including the bench. Although Prescott is unlucky to miss out, I'd be surprised whether we ever manage to field that side often. I think as with most sides in SL we'd always have at least one forward out injured.

What would be nice would be to have the ability to rotate and rest players a little as the season progresses. That little bit of a rest and reinvigoration would do wonders for the players IMO. Keeping them fresh for the business end of the season.

Massive strength in depth within our pack. They will be fighting for places when Fielden, Hansen and Hock are back and we should be an even better team!

The players we have in reserve would get into most super league teams which shows how good our strength in depth is.

Scary that we have more coming through as well. Give it another year or two and some of these lads will have to move on, we don't have enough room. We will then get slated for letting them go!

When I read this Brian, I thought you'd started a thread about our Maud!!

when it goes to starting then probably hansen will be in the 2nd row and faz on the bench but i think if it came down to 1 being in the 17 and the other not then i think faz would get the nod over hansen as he offers alot more to the team than hansen!

I'm a huge fan of Farrell and if I had to bite the bullet and leave him or Hansen out I agree it would be Hansen but we probably can fit both in and I think Hansen suits starting games a little more at the moment with Faz bringing his footwork off the bench running at tiring defences.

Either way and whatever pack we put out it's going to be a very strong one.

I disagree. I think that Farrell is more effective from the bench at the moment and a back 3 of Hansen, Hoffman and O'Loughlin is much better. Farrell is a great prospect but has had dips this year and was dropped after the Huddersfield game due to his missed tackles. In contrast I think Hansen is a lot more consistent. Farrell also needs to improve his passing game for him to ever be an effective Loose Forward.

Farrell wasn't dropped after the Huddersfield game he was out with a thigh injury. Both Farrell and Hansen have similar work rates in defence, the biggest difference is that Farrell tends to be much better in attack, especially when on form. Hansen offers solid defence but his work rate in attack tends to be pretty poor.

Whenever people don't notice Hansen during a game they say it's because he does the hard work that goes unnoticed. When Farrell doesn't stand out in attack it becomes a dip in form even though he does the same work as Hansen in defence.

Not necessarily. It all depends on how you want you're 13 to play. At Wigan we've been spoiled with creative loose forwards with O' Loughlin, Andy Farrell, Phil Clarke and Hanley who all play as an extra pivot but these days a creative loose forward is a bonus more than a necessity, especially if Sam Tomkins is at fullback. In the NRL the loose forward is usually little more than a 3rd 2nd rower operating in the middle channel. Liam Farrell is more than capable of fulfilling that role very capably. It's up to the next coach I guess

Thats not what I was told.

Well whoever told you that lied