It's all so hypothetical - as technically the whole game would have been different. Just as if you win the toss before a game and elect to field the ball rather than kick, every single play will be different from what actually happened.....

What changed the game last night for me more than anything was Carmont's wild pass 30 metres out on the 2nd tackle ( I think) which was intercepted by Leeds and led to their first try. That totally changed the course of the game as up till then Wigan were the better team and could/should have been 16 -0 up. We were making easy yards till then and creating lots of chances. After that we lost all momentum and Leeds totally dominated the 2nd quarter and could/should have had a bigger lead than 12-4.

Should the title be:

Who thinks we should have gone for 2 points?

Microsoft Word does automatic correction of the "of" to "have", is this representative of our education system?

What annoys me is sometimes we dont have the belief we can score when we are 10 metres out from their line? We werent the 2nd best attack in SL last season and the Champions for nothing. Some times we show too much respect to our opponents by taking the 2 available. Take the WCC for example. I thought we should of pushed on and went for the try. Its all in hindsight, but I wish sometimes we would back ourselves and go for it!

Definately made the right call as even though the Leeds defence seemed shot I think they could have held out for 1 more tackle as they would've had time to get there defence set. I also think If Leeds wouldn't have conceded a penalty Wigan would've scored.

In a game we expected to be tight, with no real goal kicker. Too right we should have gone for two.