3585_1319450311.jpg[img:2n0daa8z]http://riversiders.rlfans.com/images/400X100BANNER.jpg[/img:2n0daa8z]
[quote="tommyfromhull":2n0daa8z]Wigan are quickly turning into the Wigan of old - Arrogant and think they are invincible.[/quote:2n0daa8z]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_3585.jpg
Quote: Odemwingie "I think it's mainly because of the amount of metres he made. If he does that every game he will be top metre maker come the end of the year.'"
The break near the end of the game would have counted for most of them
[quote="Frank Zappa":1sacjrvf]Some scientists claim that hydrogen, because it is so plentiful, is the basic building block of the universe. I dispute that. I say there is more stupidity than hydrogen, and that is the basic building block of the universe.[/quote:1sacjrvf]
[quote="The_Enforcer":1sacjrvf]Most idiotic post ever goes to Grimmy..... The way to restart should be an arm wrestle between a designated player from each side.[/quote:1sacjrvf]:
52674_1285275725.jpg[size=50:2fqgwsdo]"The mid-to-late 1980s and early-to-mid-1990s is the most successful period for the club to date, however, even without this glorious trophy laden period, Wigan would still have won more trophies than any other professional British rugby league club due to their successes throughout the club's history."[/size:2fqgwsdo]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_52674.jpg
Must admit he looked far from being a full back last Friday. I'm was undecided as to whether he should play 1 or 6. He can be very effective coming in to the line in attack, but I think he could do more damage for us at 6 being involved more and orchestrating the play.
I don't think he is defensively good enough or strong enough to play full back. Don't get me wrong you can't fault his desire or committment but he just lacks the size. He was very poor under the bomb, saying that Salford kicked well, but I just think he would do more for us at 6. If he is to stay at 1 he needs to improve under the high ball.
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
