The thought of that is just so so wrong.

Erm, what are you going on about?

The obvious too complex for you? If you don't like listening to the commentators you can turn them off by muting the volume on the Tellybox.

HTH.

Do try to read what I said, where did I complain about the commentators? If your going to try and be a smart at least you make sure you know what I'm saying. You Look as stupid as your team otherwise.

Erm....

He's right though. JLM (A saints fan) correctly states that Phil Clarke is biased towards Wigan. Clarkey couldn't be more biased towards us if he was sat in the studio with a 'I love Ian Lenegan' hat on!!!

He asked here he complained about the commentary. I think he's had too much Calpol.

The caption on the Sky Sports website post match interview with Pat Richards

"Pat Richards gives his reaction to Sky Sports after his side moved up to joint top in the table after a 28 - 10 win at the Magic Weekend."

What is it about us having a two point lead that makes them think we are joint top?

People can complain of bias from various people but the above example is just simply inept and shoddy. Does nobody proof read anything at SKY?

Agreed, according to Eddie, Huddersfield had so many injuries, glad we beat their reserves.

Anything Clarke did, only managed to counter the bias from Hemmings.

Last night when Wire went top, im sure, he made a mess in his trousers. Today, when we went back top, the league table didnt matter.

I've never seen such bias and bitterness in one man.

Cullen has been outstanding on commentary all week, when even he turns on his personal cheerleader Eddie, it shows quite how much sh*te was being spoken by Hemmings.

Okay, Lets break this down.

1.) People on here have complained about Eddie and Stevo being biased against Wigan, stating that this is out of order and that they shouldn't be kept on Sky.

2.) The Opening Poster then states that he Likes the Bias that Clarke shows. (The Opening Poster, not me. Says THAT PHIL CLARKE IS BIASED TOWARDS WIGAN.)

3.) I then commented that they complain about Eddie and Stevo being biased, but it is okay for Clarke to be biased towards Wigan. Please tell me where I have complained about any of the commentators?

There we go, all that done without having to resort to insults about being a kid and having too much Calpol. Pretty good that isn't it?

Well I'm confused. Why is it wrong for WIGAN fans to complain when there is bias against their team and enjoy bias for it? Thought the people on these boards were sports fans who support THEIR team? Have we become the united nations or something without anyone telling me?

To be honest I don't think Clarke favours Wigan, he IMO always favours the flavour of the month but nearly always gives saints a big wrap and always compares teams to saints as we've been the bench mark in the super league era.

What I don't understand is the Wigan= gold, saints = silver and wolves = bronze, I'm not being funny but for the full 80 mins saints just dominated the game from start to finish, not just a good 2nd half display but the full 80 mins.

Saints kept a team to zero while scoring 54 points, that in my eyes is the complete performance, also we did it with lomax, meli, gidley, soliolia, wheeler, wilkin and maurie all out injured!

For me saints had to get the gold.

Maybe Clarke does favour you pies after all