The Wigan based talent was a totally separate issue. It was an argument I was all for.
This thread is about was Hansen missed, so the Wigan based talent has nothing to do with it.
People can disagree with me, thats fair enough, shame that the majority (like yourself) don't even understand the OP.
I have used insults in retaliation to the many insults I have received first.
I have argued a point, which I still agree with, you don't even probably understand the OP.

Keep it coming.

I'm off to clean behind my fridge....

THE GLORIOUS OP

Can I give you a hand?

Because I thought the post was a perfectly valid question related to the topic of whether or not HH was missed. I simply asked the question to gain a better understanding of your opinion (which you are perfectly entitled to, although I disagree with it) by asking you to clarify a point you made.

Namely this bitas we have players who can do what he can do.'"

back to the original question, no we havent missed hansen as of yet but at the moment when all fit he would still be in the 17 with out question. With hock and fielden back then i dont know. Think it will be a 50/50 one. I personally would leave him out as i prefer both mossop and farrell and then hock and fielden will come in for hansen and lima. Thats just my opinion though! I actually dont think mcguire will though.

Whatever floats your boat. If you don't understand something just ask. As the OP poster I am always willing to justify my point, no one has to agree with it. But I will discuss it.

PS I only name call when attacked.

Quote: Lucky XIII "Because I thought the post was a perfectly valid question related to the topic of whether or not HH was missed. I simply asked the question to gain a better understanding of your opinion (which you are perfectly entitled to, although I disagree with it) by asking you to clarify a point you made. Namely this bit Sure www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011 Look at his direct replacement.

Quote: Lucky XIII "Because I thought the post was a perfectly valid question related to the topic of whether or not HH was missed. I simply asked the question to gain a better understanding of your opinion (which you are perfectly entitled to, although I disagree with it) by asking you to clarify a point you made. Namely this bit Sure www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011 Look at his direct replacement.

Quote: Last Son of Wigan "Sure Except that Liam Farrell wasn't Hansen's direct replacement. They are both fully fledged first-team players in their own right. I'd call neither a squad player. Hansen and Farrell were both in the squad when HH was ruled out. His direct replacement (i.e. the player who came into the 17 the week after to replace him) was Chris Tuson. So I urge you to have a look at his direct replacement: www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011

Quote: Last Son of Wigan "Sure Except that Liam Farrell wasn't Hansen's direct replacement. They are both fully fledged first-team players in their own right. I'd call neither a squad player. Hansen and Farrell were both in the squad when HH was ruled out. His direct replacement (i.e. the player who came into the 17 the week after to replace him) was Chris Tuson. So I urge you to have a look at his direct replacement: www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2011

“Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.”

I seriously have nothing against Hansen, he's a solid player who works hard. I just have something against the abuse for suggesting he won't be missed.
Lets be honest, we have other players who can do what he can do, thankfully due to the depth we have in our squad.
In comparison if Lockers, Sam or Pat was injured long term we can't directly replace them.

That's the basis of it.

I agree. Our 18 and 30+ point defeats were because of kicking