FORUMS > Wigan Warriors > Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Fringe Player | 1200 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2022 | 3 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Phuzzy "Because we're talking about the appeal of the appeal! There is no place for guilt or grading to be challenged in the 2nd appeal. For point 4 to apply the ban would have to be "so excessive" when set against the charge (head high tackle) that has already been determined. 2 games doesn't fall into that category. It doesn't matter whether Saints believe he was guilty or not. The option to challenge that was met in the 1st appeal. It has no bearing on whether the punishment would be considered excessive or not.
Saints themselves have said that the 2nd appeal was against procedure and point of law. Why are you even arguing this?'"
Well that's interesting because having just spoken to my mate at Wigan (you know exactly who he is because I've told you previously) then he has confirmed that you can challenge the original grading still. Given he used to go with the Wigan players as their representative then its fair to say he knows more than you or I.
So yes whilst you may be correct in that on THIS occasion (capital letters used for emphasis) Saints appealed on a technicality then the fact that you have spent all afternoon categorically telling me that a second appeal can only be on a technicality is clearly incorrect.
To put it in the bluntest terms possible to avoid any further fudging of the facts:
You are wrong.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Academy Player | 2193 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2022 | 2 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: The Reaper "As far as the RFL/tribunals explaining how they’ve come to the decision on a frivolous appeal, this is the only thing I can find which is what I was referencing:
Thanks Reaper, it seems that everything with the RFL is based on a wing and a prayer. I wonder if some clubs/players have a right to a retrospective challenge.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Fringe Player | 1200 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2022 | 3 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Zig "Stu, have you managed to locate the frivolity rule? I can’t find anything and I am now starting to think it was made up!'"
I've not. I've spent all day arguing with Phuzzy. I've not got the energy to look for frivolity rules
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 4470 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
69704_1656949802.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_69704.jpg |
|
| I think what we've established from all of this is that Matty Lees was rightly banned for contact to the head and Saints have tried everything to get him off with it
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 1353 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Egg Chasing "I think what we've established from all of this is that Matty Lees was rightly banned for contact to the head and Saints have tried everything to get him off with it'"
Couldnt have said it better myself,there you go,end of.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5482 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
29557_1715786245.png :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_29557.png |
|
| Quote: Stu M "Well that's interesting because having just spoken to my mate at Wigan (you know exactly who he is because I've told you previously) then he has confirmed that you can challenge the original grading still. Given he used to go with the Wigan players as their representative then its fair to say he knows more than you or I.
So yes whilst you may be correct in that on THIS occasion (capital letters used for emphasis) Saints appealed on a technicality then the fact that you have spent all afternoon categorically telling me that a second appeal can only be on a technicality is clearly incorrect.
To put it in the bluntest terms possible to avoid any further fudging of the facts
This would be your mate who's accompanied our players to many unsuccessful appeals, would it?
I've done a double check and you can't challenge the grading per se. Only the severity of the punishment if deemed excessive as already said elsewhere in this thread. It actually specifically states in the rules that the first appeal allows for grading to be challenged but doesn't in the second. You also have no recourse to challenge guilt in the second as you also claimed.
Even if we agree I was right, albeit for the wrong reason. That'll do.
You, on the other hand were just wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Fringe Player | 1200 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2022 | 3 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Phuzzy "This would be your mate who's accompanied our players to many unsuccessful appeals, would it?
I've done a double check and you can't challenge the grading per se. Only the severity of the punishment if deemed excessive as already said elsewhere in this thread. It actually specifically states in the rules that the first appeal allows for grading to be challenged but doesn't in the second. You also have no recourse to challenge guilt in the second as you also claimed.
Even if we agree I was right, albeit for the wrong reason. That'll do.
You, on the other hand were just wrong.'"
Show me exactly where in the policy and the definitive Operational Rules Policy where it says this. Just wondering where you are doing your checking that you refer to.
As an aside I’ve no desire to argue all day with you on here and I’m pretty sure everyone else is sick of reading the back and forth so please take to PM if you want to continue this.
If it’s in the policy and I’ve missed it as you infer then I’ll hold my hands up and admit I was wrong. This is my last post on this thread about it so will carry on in private if you so wish.
My apologies to everyone else caught up in this.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
First Team Player | 1353 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2020 | 4 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Stu M "Show me exactly where in the policy and the definitive Operational Rules Policy where it says this. Just wondering where you are doing your checking that you refer to.
As an aside I’ve no desire to argue all day with you on here and I’m pretty sure everyone else is sick of reading the back and forth so please take to PM if you want to continue this.
If it’s in the policy and I’ve missed it as you infer then I’ll hold my hands up and admit I was wrong. This is my last post on this thread about it so will carry on in private if you so wish.
My apologies to everyone else caught up in this.'"
Dont apologise for defending your team,even if you are wrong
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 29698 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2004 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
10919_1322084665.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_10919.jpg |
|
| Potentially opening up an old debate here but I see Micky Mac has been cleared to play on Saturday, after a successful appeal. It’s only fair to mention that, given we discuss Saints bans/appeals. I think it adds weight to people saying we need to stop rolling over and letting our belly be tickled. That MM challenge wasn’t much to write home about but it was comfortably worse than the Kaide Ellis one against HKR and we didn’t appeal that. I’ve said before, Saints would help themselves by stop making so many iffy challenges but we definitely look to be a bit soft and don’t want to rock the boat when it comes to appeals.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Academy Player | 2193 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2022 | 2 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Saints look like they are in the zone.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2984 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Zig "Saints look like they are in the zone.'"
Peaked 6 weeks early
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Academy Player | 2193 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2022 | 2 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Quote: Zig "Saints look like they are in the zone.'"
After tonight so do we.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4032 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
27542_1296773722.jpg RICHARDS IS SUPERMAN!!!!
Wire_91 wrote:its your first final in about 8 years and now you ravin and rantin about it F**k off, and ill be going old trafford tomoz cheering on the saints and ill be writing on this forum givin you loads of shi* when your drying you eyes and the wire fan will be here handing out the tissues in the thousands, thats if you do take that many fans cause now it looks like its your fans who have jumped on the band wagon now your in a final, this time last year there was only 1000 people in the jjb and now its fillin up cause youve won the league hahaha proper true supporters you are:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_27542.jpg |
|
| Great win for the academy away at Saints today
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 4470 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
69704_1656949802.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_69704.jpg |
|
| As the old chant used to go "are you watching St Helens"
They definitely expected to be 2nd after this weekend. Ah well..
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Fringe Player | 1200 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2022 | 3 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
: |
|
| Whilst Peet has quite rightly lauded O Neill as one of the best young players in SL in his press conference, it’s also refreshing to see him give huge credit too to Delaney. I’ve mentioned him on here months ago as a real standout and someone with huge potential to be playing prop at 19 and not looking out of place.
I know Hill has been good too but Delaney has played way more minutes this season.
Well done to Peet for his comments.
|
|
|
|
|
|