FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > Wigan Warriors > Hansen to face disciplinary?
153 posts in 11 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Pemps
RankPostsTeam
International Star310
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2021Sep 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Tezzerwolf "Must have been something in it or he wouldn't have been cited. Anyway at least Leeds can beat you with a full team. If there was something in it he would have been found guilty?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach15259No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200619 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: dirtbag83 "So you haven't even seen it?'"


icon_lol.gif

What a give away that was!

RankPostsTeam
International Star1704
JoinedServiceReputation
Aug 201113 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2023Dec 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



So you haven't even seen it?


damn hard to see what isnt there in the first place

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach555
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2017Aug 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



That's the whole point, Tezzer. There was nothing in it - as was proved by the Disciplinary panel.

If Hock had been cited for the "punch" he threw (in the 58th minute?), even though it was more of a push away, I would have accepted it as he did make illegal contact with an opponent's head. I would have accepted a ban - even though it would have been harsh.

But there was absolutely nothing in Hansen's challenge if you look at it on the Sky+ replay. I don't think you'll have noticed anything untoward when watching it live on TV - neither did any of the commentators, nor the ref nor Lynch, the player who was tackled.

How "bad" was Solomona's tackle?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2768No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200619 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: The Ginger Pearl "Solomona given 1 match for a similar incident
Hopefully this will dispell the paranoia abundant on this board. I don't hold out much hope.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach15259No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200619 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Suzy Banyon "Hopefully this will dispell the paranoia abundant on this board. I don't hold out much hope.'"


How do you explain the citation in the first place?

I find it hard to understand how one corner of the judiciary can decide a player has a case to answer, and the other corner - having viewed the same evidence - can decide he doesn't.

If nothing else it may have interfered slightly with Wigan's prep. Not saying that was the ploy, but if it was it will have worked.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach29774
JoinedServiceReputation
Nov 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Cruncher "How do you explain the citation in the first place?

I find it hard to understand how one corner of the judiciary can decide a player has a case to answer, and the other corner - having viewed the same evidence - can decide he doesn't.

If nothing else it may have interfered slightly with Wigan's prep. Not saying that was the ploy, but if it was it will have worked.'"



I've not seen the incident but reading every person on here saying theres nothing in it makes you wonder why he had to turn up to be found not guilty. They must have given Hansen a couple of the worst days of his life waiting for the decision which makes it all the stranger.

They really need to find some consistency with these decisions. To call up Hansen but not Hock or Lynch is crazy by all accounts.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach555
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2017Aug 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Suzy Banyon "
Quote: Suzy Banyon "Solomona given 1 match for a similar incident
Hopefully this will dispell the paranoia abundant on this board. I don't hold out much hope.'"


If Solomona's ban isn't overturned on appeal in the next few days, then I'll admit to minor paranoia - but after the bans handed out to Wigan players in the past year or so( Tuson, Coley, Lima etc) and the manner in which Morley, Carvell, Peacock and Bailey in particular have escaped punishment, it it any wonder that there is a certain amount of paranoia amongst Wigan fans?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach555
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2017Aug 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Fames "That's the whole point, Tezzer. There was nothing in it - as was proved by the Disciplinary panel.

If Hock had been cited for the "punch" he threw (in the 58th minute?), even though it was more of a push away, I would have accepted it as he did make illegal contact with an opponent's head. I would have accepted a ban - even though it would have been harsh.

But there was absolutely nothing in Hansen's challenge if you look at it on the Sky+ replay. I don't think you'll have noticed anything untoward when watching it live on TV - neither did any of the commentators, nor the ref nor Lynch, the player who was tackled.

How "bad" was Solomona's tackle?'"


How to "out-troll" the trolls!

I didn't get a reply to my question about how bad Solomona's tackle was. Late last night I thus went on the Warrington board where there is a post on Solomona's citing/ban. Several pages of the usual anti-Wigan vitriol - massive injustice about Solomona being banned etc etc. I thus repeated the above post - saying Hansen should never have been cited as it was an innocuous challenge and asking again about Solomona's tackle.

There then followed some intelligent posts from Wire fans - agreeing that Hansen was innocent. Someone had seen the tackle on some highlights. It then transpired that Solomona had in fact pleaded guilty to a reckless challenge and that Baile (the tackled player) was injured because of it. It is very unlikely he will appeal because he pleaded guilty - and this indeed may have helped him escape a lengthier ban!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach18737No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200519 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2024May 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED

Moderator


I assume Solomona is out of the Wigan game then?

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach381No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201015 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2014Jul 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I'm sure I remember the outcry in Oz when Thurston had to trapes all the way down to Sydney to answer a trumped up charge before the last Origin game. The mighty Maroons argued that this did nothing more than distrupt the palyer and the coaching staff, when they should have been busy honing skills elsewhere.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2088
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2024Nov 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



rlhttps://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3129rl

This was the Hansen case. He pleaded not guilty and was found not guilty.

rlhttps://www.therfl.co.uk/disciplinary/item?3146rl

This was the Solomona case in which he pleaded guilty but not deliberate. The injury sustained was the major aggravating factor.

The main difference between the two incidents is that Solomona committed a crusher tackle whereas Hansen didn't.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach555
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200915 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2017Aug 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



And all the Wire fans' anger at the seeming injustice of it all was totally misplaced - as usual!

The majority of Leeds fans also think it's an injustice and the RfL are biased in Wigan's favour!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach15259No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200619 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Fames "And all the Wire fans' anger at the seeming injustice of it all was totally misplaced - as usual!

The majority of Leeds fans also think it's an injustice and the RfL are biased in Wigan's favour!'"


If a guy pleads guilty then it's pretty difficult to see how he can be let off.

The Warrington anger is indeed misplaced.

As for Leeds, if they're so angry because Harrison Hansen has been cleared to play against them, I think it says more about them than it does about anyone else. If it was Sam Tomkins or Pat Richards I could understand it.

RankPostsTeam
International Star1522No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jun 201113 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jan 2022May 2020LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Supporters of dirty Carvel and dirty Bailey are not in a position to throw the first stone

153 posts in 11 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Pemps
153 posts in 11 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Pemps



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


10.17529296875:10
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
39m
Film game
karetaker
5766
52m
Getting a new side to gel
Wigan Bull
2
Recent
New Kit
Cokey
70
Recent
Fixtures
Hockley Bron
12
Recent
Fixtures 2025
Wigan Bull
10
Recent
Transfer Talk V5
Seth
517
Recent
Ground Improvements
phe13
198
Recent
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Theeaststand
4048
Recent
Shopping list for 2025
HU8HFC
5588
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
46s
Salford placed in special measures
poplar cats
111
49s
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
tad rhino
2611
53s
Fixtures 2025
Wigan Bull
10
1m
Pre Season - 2025
Hullrealist
191
1m
New Kit
Cokey
70
1m
Shirt reveal coming soon
Khlav Kalash
2
2m
Rumours and signings v9
Mark_P1973
28902
2m
Shopping list for 2025
HU8HFC
5588
2m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40802
4m
Salford
Smiffy27
59
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Shirt reveal coming soon
Khlav Kalash
2
TODAY
Opening Championship and League One Fixtures for 2025 Released
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Getting a new side to gel
Wigan Bull
2
TODAY
Fixtures
Hockley Bron
12
TODAY
Writers required
H.G.S.A
1
TODAY
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS