Why would it warrant a red card? Did you consult your Sky commentators "guide to the rules" for that?

Mcguire Should have been penalised and Tomkins should have been sent from the field of play....
thats why I said Id rather see a "holding back" and have it punished than seeing Tomkins Stay on the pitch for what he did a simple penalty isnt good enough Ganson would have had him off double quick.

sorry if it wasnt clear Ive had to sift through some nonesense on this forum today.

I havent re-watched the game and Alibert bless him didnt have a clue, and I still dont know what penalty was given and whether it was taken from the correct spot..... he's the worst ref by some distance but to be fair he's been good to you...

I agree with you there, if it was Ganson he would of had no hesitation in sending Joel off

Your right about Alibert too, at times he is so indecisive and it was good work by the linesman in the last minute to sort the situation out. What is interesting is that all the games we have lost this season Bentham has either been the ref or the video ref

In all seriousness tho Bentham he was the one who told Alibert about the penalty of Donald taking out Richards, just a shame he didnt realise the penalty should have been where the ball landed.

My opinion on what i consider to be old news.
And you need to find some better bait ........

I agree it maybe shouldnt of been a penalty for that. Sky showing the replay so many times in slow motion definately made it look worse. Crusaders had a penalty given against them for the exact same thing against Hull FC the other week so at least they are being consistent. Really we should of had a penalty on our 30m line where McGuire committed the offence, but instead Donald was judged to make the offence, hence why I'm saying the penalty was in the wrong. But it doesnt matter now anyway, Leeds deserved the win we need to concentrate on Friday.

Correct.

It's also being ignored that Leeds were effectively down to 12 men, sin bin for McGuire or not. His injury meant they were a man down, so the sin bin/send off debate is utterly futile. Only a narcissistic referee would have binned a man on a stretcher with 5 seconds left.

I give you Steve Ganson.

Did anyone grab hold of the ref like one of your players did not so long ago?

No way.

Ut should never have been a bloody penalty in the first place, donald was committed, he dived into the tackle before richards even kicked the ball ffs.....and then the ball went straight into touch.

the penalty SHOULD have been 20 metres further back for the carmont incident.

Watch the game again...

The ball did not go straight into touch, it bounced then went out. Most of the people are saying that the penalty was harsh as Donald was committed, but if thats the penalty that is given then its taken where the ball landed. They are the rules. Kick was missed anyway, so I dont know what people are still going on about.

Do you Warriors fans now have emotional closure?

Can we all move on with our lives and respective partners?

If so, this is beautiful.

bloody marvellous.....folk calling for a red for a cheating little , and no..we wont be cheering him in the tri nations cos he wont get picked.
calling for red for joels kick out.

well forget this garbage and read another topic on here...............the only one to be up before the RL is Buderus,,,now that deffo should have been straight red.