Correct decision by IL and KR on the position of Head Coach.

Carry on Lammy, you did a great job in making the team play a more attractive style of play in what has been a difficult season both on and off the field.

You make a good point there. Should Lam not win one of the two major trophies next season would it put him in the same category as Brian Noble? Or worse?

Let's look at where we were when Noble came in and rescued us:

2006 - Came in and rescued us from certain relegation.
2007 - Stabilised the club in 6th place, took us to two semi finals (a poor loss v Catalans in the cup, battered in the playoff semi by a much better Leeds team).
2008 - 4th in the League, QF loss in the Cup (Leeds Away), Playoff Semi loss (Leeds Away).
2009 - 6th in the League, two semi final losses (Wire Away in the Cup and Saints Away in the Playoffs).

So Noble took us to five semi finals in his four years with us. We had some quality players but just couldn't get us into a Final and the chance of silverware.

I feel with Lam we have an overall better team (and squad) than back then, we were inches away from becoming Champions. Next season should see us stronger I hope.

Seeing that you have said more or less the same thing on the Wigan Fans website, perhaps you can explain in your opinion why any Coach at Wigan needs to win a trophy or else when there is more to being a Head Coach of the club in the eyes of those who appoint the person into the the position of Head Coach.

Although, some think on here that I am anti IL/KR, they have got it right where Lam is concerned in what has been a abnormal and difficult season. We won the league leaders trophy, only lost in the Grand Final on a debatable penalty and defensive mistake and also lost in the semi final of the Challenge Cup by the conditions on the day.

Yourself and a minority might not want Lam as Coach, but it is evident by many of the comments on the local social media that the majority of supporters do!

We all want titles and trophies and that is the goal he has clearly been set for next year which I think is fair enough and realistic.

In year 3 I think this team can now be called “his team” there is always a transition period from the previous coach to a new coach and given everything he has had to deal with in his 2 seasons it’s probably been a longer one than normal.

Trophies or not I like to judge a team on what I see on the field and a few things have been evident during his tenure such as-

More entertaining to watch
Better defence
Better discipline particularly in the opposition half
Individual player improvement
Less reliance on Locky

I think we are 1 signing away (Prop) from a fantastic squad which is all very exciting.

I’m really happy with this news. I look forward very much to us hitting the ground running in 2021 with a settled side more than capable of challenging on all fronts.

Not sure when I'm bothering to waste my time to respond to your obvious trolling, but here we go anyway...

That all depends on the expectations of the club. Finals and semi finals aren't good enough for a club like Wigan unfortunately.

As long as you're getting to a certain minimum standard week-to-week, our system all comes down to how you perform in knockout games. On that basis, despite not taking us to a final, I'd have Noble ahead of Lam so far.

Knockout records
Noble's Wigan as favourites (ignoring non-SL opposition) - W2 L1
Lam's Wigan as favourites - W2 L2

Noble's Wigan as equal or underdog - W8 L5
Lam's Wigan as equal or underdog - W0 L2

I think performance in the weekly rounds is something that, rightly or wrongly, gets overlooked. In many ways you make your own luck by being consistently good. Saints have proven that consistency, week to week, invariably returns a trophy.

I want to win trophies, but I also don't want to feel like the weekly rounds aren't somehow important (especially when fans are in the stands). We as fans shouldn't accept anything less than the best from the players.

Lam has earned his new deal after the CC semi. The week to week consistency we've seen recently is now the benchmark imo.

Also I'm very reluctant to talk about being entertained. For me the GF was the most entertaining game this season, but we only saw two tries. Entrainment is subjective, so you can only really judge on win/loss and trophies.

I used to feel like that under Wane, but it usually resulted in winning trophies.

It's a tough call really. Play like Cas in 2017 but win nothing, or accept a few lacklustre displays and take the big prize at the end?

Would that be the same Saints who finished in the top 2 every year from 07-10 and got zero Grand Final wins to show for it? Of course we want to win every game but the system we have means you have to be able to raise your game/not choke in those knockout games or you come out with nothing but a hubcap. We have seen Leeds do it in the past and win a lot of silverware, Wane's Wigan likewise. That's where I'm questioning Lam based on his record so far. What do the players say every year when they win the LLS? "This is nice but it means nothing unless we go and win the Grand Final."

That Saints team won the CC in 2008, but outside of that - Is that side an anomaly? You could probably make a case for it. Us, Wire, Leeds and the current Saints side have all, at some point, had a period of consistency that's resulted in trophy wins.

There's more it it than just luck of the playoffs. If you're consistently a good team, then history proves (apart from one side) that you'll win a trophy or two.

It's a difficult one. I'd still argue that if you can be consistently good, over a period longer than one season (two min, possibly three) then you'll win a trophy. You can't be a flash in the pan like Cas or Hudds a few seasons before that.

The two seasons under Madge were the modern pinnacle imo. We had weekly consistency and one trophy each season. I could stomach the playoff defeat in his last season as, not only had I enjoyed the week to week rugby, 50% of the prizes + one hub cap went to us.

I'll say it again - if you're consistent week in and week out, then you won't be far off one of the two big prizes.

This is the reason why I'm not happy with this announcement. Wane got us to do just enough to win, with the odd bad match through the regular season and win at the end. Lam is the same, but with no trophy.