|
 |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 20544 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote MadDogg="MadDogg"Feel bad for the guy but I don't think its as bad a blow for England as some will make out - may even turn out to be a blessing in disguise.
He's been in good form lately but on the international stage over the last 2 years his lack of agility in defence has been glaringly obvious and he's not really been able to follow up an awesome Tri Nations in 2006 with similar performances since.
Prop is a position where England has a few decent players knocking around - maybe an opportunity for the Wigan 8 or 10?'"
Totally agree, in my opinion he should have retired after the World Cup.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1513 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2015 | Nov 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Coventry Warrior!="Coventry Warrior!"It doesnt matter if he is a respected player in Aus, he hasnt been as good this season as he has previously. We need to stop picking players on reputation. I would rather of had Coley in the England team over Peacock this season anyway.'"
You can't be serious?
It's not on 'reputation' it's the fact he's still one of the top props in the country. He may not have had the best season, but every game he plays he'll make the most metres forward, put in the most work in defence. Coley over him? Crazy. Take those C+W specs off
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 5799 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2015 | May 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Who has played better this season? Peacock or Coley?
Who is in better form? Peacock or Coley?
So why shouldnt Coley get picked over him. Were not top for no reason, its obviously on the back of great work by our forwards. Graham and Morley would be my starting props after that its up for grabs. As someone has already said maybe its a blessing in disguise. Someone else will get a go instead of the same players being picked all the time that do nothing.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1513 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2015 | Nov 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| difficult questions to answer really as i'm guessing you nor me have been to many Rhinos games this year.
If it came down to a clear choice between the both of them though, i'd take Peacock over Coley 100 times out of 100
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1661 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Come on, JP has carried the Leeds pack week in week out, look at his Stats against us last week, almost double the metres any other forward on either team made, and loads of tackles too.
Coley has had a fine season, but shouldn't be mentioned in the same class as Peacock.
I'm gutted for the guy that he won't be able to play at Wembley.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2233 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2010 | 15 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2013 | Oct 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Coventry Warrior!="Coventry Warrior!"It doesnt matter if he is a respected player in Aus, he hasnt been as good this season as he has previously. We need to stop picking players on reputation. I would rather of had Coley in the England team over Peacock this season anyway.'"
You don't [ireally [/imean that, do you?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3448 | Wigan Warriors |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2024 | Sep 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote JordanWarriors="JordanWarriors"difficult questions to answer really as i'm guessing you nor me have been to many Rhinos games this year.
If it came down to a clear choice between the both of them though, =#FF0000i'd take Peacock over Coley 100 times out of 100'"
Based on reputation, which is flawed.
Whilst you've admitted not seeing Leeds that much this season (nor have I), we have seen how well Coley's been playing.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 883 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2017 | Nov 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Gotta say I agree, on this seasons form it should be coley over peacock, fit or not, peacock has had a poor season. As somebody else has pointed out though it makes not a jot of difference becasue we have a joke of a coach!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1661 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote Vectrabeast="Vectrabeast"Gotta say I agree, on this seasons form it should be coley over peacock, fit or not, peacock has had a poor season. '"
Have a look at the comparative stats between Coley and Peacock, if that's a poor season I'll have some of that.
www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2010
|
|
Quote Vectrabeast="Vectrabeast"Gotta say I agree, on this seasons form it should be coley over peacock, fit or not, peacock has had a poor season. '"
Have a look at the comparative stats between Coley and Peacock, if that's a poor season I'll have some of that.
www.superleague.co.uk/statistics ... eason=2010
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4576 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2010 | Sep 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Coventry Warrior!="Coventry Warrior!"Who has played better this season? Peacock or Coley?
Who is in better form? Peacock or Coley?
So why shouldnt Coley get picked over him. Were not top for no reason, its obviously on the back of great work by our forwards. Graham and Morley would be my starting props after that its up for grabs. As someone has already said maybe its a blessing in disguise. Someone else will get a go instead of the same players being picked all the time that do nothing.'"
You my friend should be on stage.
Everything about JP's game this year has been superior to Coley's.
Coley's played twice more and made less meters.
Coley makes 1m less per carry.
27 less offloads
Less tackle busts
Less tackles
Less clean breaks
Less marker tackles
The only things Coley has in his favour are less missed tackles and less errors.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 11377 | St. Helens |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Sam Buca="Sam Buca"The only things Coley has in his favour are less missed tackles and less errors.'"
Coley makes more errors if you take into account the number of times both players carry the ball.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4576 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2010 | Sep 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote FearTheVee="FearTheVee"Coley makes more errors if you take into account the number of times both players carry the ball.'"
Fair point FTV. I couldn't be ar[is[/ied working it out though.
|
|
|
 |
|