Alot of Aussie fans believe Phelps best position to be fullback.

Honestly, some posters on here are embarrasing with their criticisms.

Phelps is woeful, saying he is better in one position than another means very little.

Explain "woeful"

True but it was also said on here a while ago (might even have been AJ ) that the Aussies think his best position is SO/SH.

woeful

–adjective

1. full of woe; wretched; unhappy: a woeful situation.
2. affected with, characterized by, or indicating woe: woeful melodies.
3. of wretched quality; sorry; poor: a woeful collection of paintings

Bloody Hell Mathers.

Richards not playing could lose us the bloody match

I wouldn't be overly worried about him in that position if he had been playing regular over the last few weeks but his lack of match sharpness is my real concern.

On the upside he's playing for his future with him only looking 3rd chocie at best in the any of the outside back positions so that should fire him up.

With all these odds stacking up against a good wigan performance my brain's Murryfield 2002 warning is lighting up? It just brings back horrible memories?

We had good players back then though!

and a game plan .

and a fullback who was playing on one leg!

Maybe we should have just played Richards afterall

i do not understand why people are so worried now paaat is out ... lets be realistic here we are never going to win this game, full strength or not. saints are head and shoulders above our team right now. all accross the park. we will have done well if they dont put 40 on us