Yes we can read but your posts aren't particularly easy to understand. You see, I was under the impression that you were saying we were getting rid of two players and signing 3 meaning we would be over the salary cap. You then mentioned Leeds signing Smith as an example of you also having an extra player so this confirmed to me that I was correct in my first assumption. If you didn't mean this I suggest you start writing in proper English.

If you understood the rules on overseas players, you would know that, regardless of the salary cap, we would need to get rid of some imports in order to be able to sign a few more anyway. Don't let the facts get in the way of a really poor attempt at trolling the Wigan board after a defeat however.

pi$$ off back on your own board

still sore are we

no your not understanding me i am not saying you will be over the cap if u signed 3 and get rid of 2 , i am saying if you sign 3 and get rid of nobody you will be over i have said that loads so u obviously cannot read, you lot take everything the wrong way, remember the crunch games in the playoffs the last few years just remind me of them agin please who knocked you out

Just got in and fast forwarded to it on sky +. dear lord what the hell do you have to do to get sent off. Coley sent off and a 2 match ban and this clown Abblett going off the same rule book should get 6 games and a hefty fine. Never had much of a problem with Leeds being dirty in the past but that 'challenge' and then Baileys knee into Carmont IMO show Leeds in a new light.

Dear lord. Go read the numerous threads on the subjects. We have about 8 or 9 players OOC, lots of them are leaving.

NEXT.......

What has anything you have said got to do with Abbletts challenge? You lost, accept your at best the 4th best team in the league this year and a dirty side when you dont get all your own way.

just back from Leeds and waiting for the re-run at 12-30 but Ganson's lack of balls was just disgraceful. It shouldn't matter whether a match is one or seventy nine minutes old, those "tackles" are straight reds. To add insult to injury he then sends coley for ten when it looked as though the player was on his way down anyway, he then fails to sin bin Leeds for three penalties at succesive paly the balls.

nobody is saying abbletts challenge was good mate, ye he deserves a fine and a ban but tbh i dont think baileys was that bad, alot of players do that running in to the tackle , he was just bracing for impact, fozzard does it and gets away with it, and i have accepted the loss u tit i already said well done to you lot but the season hasnt ended yet, is ther some kind of problem with that, u relly take it to heart lol

one mention of the sc and you lot explode lol calm down , so next time u say we are dirty cheats just remember what you have done goodnight have fun

Damn, and there I was thinking we were going to have a 50 man squad next year. I'll never listen to radio Leeds or Humberside again! Gutted now.

Why do I get the feeling Batesy's parents were twins?

The problem is you trolling and being an when emotions are still high from the game trying to get a reaction. The run from Bailey he deliberatly lifts the knee as Carmont runs in to make the tackle, ive just watched it 3 times and it gets no better. Whether you think 'its not that bad' or not it was deliberate.

not even bothered to read most of this thread today. Leeds where lucky to get on the board. Carmont never hit their winger high. And I am still fuming about ablett. He holded his arms going for the "tackle" it was a straight red and it shows McClenan has no sense as a coach. He went for exactly the same tactics as wire did, hit us hard. Unfortunately we have wisened up to those tactics and without two frontline props and mossy we hammered them upfront!

Congrats to feks as well for showing Madge up big time in attack! Keep working on that defence and you could have a winners ring to your name!

keeping this on topic, I've just seen this challenge on SSN and it looked worse than it did live. Absolutely terrible.