Carmont only has a year at most in him. Richards contract is up after next season and there's no word on Pryce's contract situation.

but at rovers he is going to play week in week out

Well you can continue to have him on loan until we need him.

If Pryce is on a big wage as rumoured i would offer him reduced terms on a 1 year deal and if he says no then Charnley takes his place. I wouldnt be too worried if Pryce went and Charnley stepped into his place tomorrow.

that is right but josh needs more experiance to play for a top club like you yes we are a decent team but grand final and wembley are out of our reach at least for a few more years and your a team sat at top on sl and had a qf against leeds in cc and looks you will take league and should go to trafford

Pryce signed a 1 year extension last year under IL so I'd imagine he won't be on big money this year. If he signs another 1 year deal for next season, you can bet that won't be mega bucks either.

In the current situation, probably.

However when Welham returns and even Colbon, they should get ahead of Charnley.

(Charnley looks a top promise, but Welham has been great all year).

It would be great cover to sign Charnley again on loan next season, mind.

Left wing and left centre, Charnley has been signed as cover for Webster and Ratu in the right centre which is where he will play for the rest of this season once his loan is extended. Charlie will go onto the bench in place of Cook

Thats not too bad then. He does deserve another year to see if he can kick on as long as its on our terms. There wouldnt be much point throwing too much money at him with Charnley pushing for a place.

Once you get your centres back then Charnley wont even get in the team anyway.

Yeah, when we get them back next season

Idiot Come back when you know what to talk about