Not on this one no.

Why name an obviously committed player? I lost count of him getting a bad knock and playing on in games.

He was never less than 100% committed to the Wigan cause and it's not fair to lump him into the Moran category of players.

Fully agree, thought he never gave less than 100% for us!

All I said was Hoffman is more committed than Phelps was. I dont think I am wrong.

But then putting him in the same sentence as Moran and Vaealiki? Laughable.

Does it matter what sentence he is in? Stop being so petty, this thread is about Hoffman and his commitment to Wigan, stop trying to change it into a stupid argument about a player thats long gone.

Your the one that brought other players into a thread regarding Hoffman. If you're going to make stupid comments like your original one then you have to expect people to comment back.

Stop backtracking, it's safe to say he was lumped in as an equal to the others. Now if you'd have thrown in Florimo or some others of their ilk fair enough.

from the replay it seems to be an elbow from Lima that rattles his marbles, nowt to do with a big hit from mason other than he was the player three of them were trying to tackle.

Well for me, what Phelps gave to Hull and all their players after he signed for them makes him an absolute little rat and puts him up there with what Robinson did with the Pongia situation.

Thats the reason I used him as an example.

I was thinking of this when you posted and wondered if there was more to it that I didn't know about. I'm sure next time we play Hull he will get some 'special treatment' from a few of the Wigan players.

Correct. You don't do that in Rugby League. Phelps is a little worm who wants absolutely smashing when Wigan next play Hull FC.

What did he do ?

How do you know it was Phelps?

(2)