No Sam - awaits the meltdown on other areas of RLFANS.

Hock - Gouging Grade E 4-8 matches. Sounds about right.

Who was it that jumped on Sam after he did what fullbacks have been doing for decades by trying to get his leg under the ball as Clarke grounded it?

He should have been called up and banned.

No meltdown coming from me regarding Sam, I'm surprised it even merited a caution. The Hock decision was as expected.

Briers. Making him run up and down the pitch to talk to Silverwood was punishment enough for him.

I think Radlinski should get a retrospective ban for his awful attempt to prevent a try with his leg at Murrayfield in 2002.

Only surprise for me is McGoldrick's 1-2 games ban recommendation. Should be 5 at least.

Hock is also charged with punching too, which could give him an extra game on top of his other ban.

Well, it's now ok to jump on a prone player and cause an all in 'brawl'. Well until Sam does it, then these boards will meltdown. Again.

Hock deserves all he gets.

Hock is now up for another charge for punching Harrison - which could get a one game ban.

That's his season done. Final warning for me now with Hock. He of all people should know he has to keep his nose clean (bum tish).

Hock should get the full 8 and probably deserves more. He really does have sh*t for brains

Kylie Leuluai should have banned last week as well. That was more ridiculous then the Briers one.

I couldn't believe it when he did it, it was so blatant and so stupid, they would probably have scored. Should have got a yellow or a game ban imo.

Lets just say we dont expect to see Hock until Superleague next season.

Do you even want him back at all?

Yes. We're good at forgivness.