4-28 against 12 men before yet another interception when it was 12 v 12.

I'm struggling to remember as bad a performance in a single half.

If Peet doesn't get angry after that he never will.

You didn't watch us in 2006 then? Or Leeds and Saints in 2005? Or hidings at multiple places over the years.

Not a great half, but worst ever is a bit of a stretch.

I was there in 2006 and that week in 2005. I can't remember a half as bad as tonight, especially given we had a man advantage for all but 3 minutes of it.

Booooooooooo Ian lenaghan
Booooooooooo Kris Radlinski
Booooooooooo Bloody rubbish Wigan

He should be angry with himself, missed an opportunity to get some combinations tried out, game time for youngsters and injured players back in the fold with low risk. Now we have shown our hand and its a losing one...time to step up.

18 - 40 ? I was working this evening, just seen the result . Dear God !

75-0
70-0

No more needs be said.

So the CC winning coach and second in the table at the min coach needs to be angry with himself and should have picked players that armchair coaches are telling him to use because obviously these coaches know more.Far enough.

He didnt give the interception passes
He didnt fall of tackles
He didnt have enough heart & desire to win this game.
No the players let the coach and the fans down
And I hate bagging players but it just wasnt our day,we will bounce back,hopefully next week.

1st Leeds 24 Wigan 0
2nd Leeds 46 Wigan 0

1st Saints 35 Wigan 0
2nd Saints 40 Wigan 0

You're right. Last night was much worse.

I think the main difference this time to previous defeats was we were so obviously the better team in the first half, Leeds were never in it apart from an interception and we should have been out of site.

2nd half 400% turnaround.
Most of the other games we were expected to get beat and the games never looked like being on top.

Bingo!

I knew when posting this Egg Chasing, Jukesay and you would be straight on it. Lads, it is ok to criticise the club or a team performance from time to time if it is deserved.

I did post context, but that is obviously too complex for some posting the 2005 scores at me when the opposition had 13 and were both on a different level to that 2005 team. Letting in 28 against 12 in under 40 minutes and only scoring 4 is right up there.

Oh you're so smart. How lucky we are to have such an intellectual amongst us.

Last three posts from WLA - 2x criticisms of a performance and criticism of a signing in Hampshire. Absolutely nothing in between, nothing about the good run we had before the Hull game & actually, nothing remotely positive really.

I'm happy to criticise the club, but with that comes the other side of the coin and saying well done too.

It was worse than that, it was 4-34 second half

Probably expected too when we have a coach that only got the job because of his accent.