Just got back from Carfest at Oulton Park, Cheshire where I saw the difference between RL & RFU yet again. In amongst the food stalls, cars and music was a three stand promotional display containing 2 kids events plus a stall selling FRU merchandised all professionally presented and organised. Did we see a similar display promoting RL - NO! RFU = crap game run professionally whereas RL = great game run by baffoons. This, plus the over complicated structure, is another reason why RL will be dead on its knees in 10years, completely overshadowed by RU & NRL. Something must be done now to force the existing management out and replaced by professional business people with strategic vision.

Just one thing stops RL doing that.......Money..

Over £3 million profit from the World Cup - some of that should be used to promote the game further.

Cr@p game that yet attracts money, blue chip sponsors and 80,000 fans per England international.

The above doesn't seem to really make sense? The parts about blue chip companies, money and high attendance's is all FACT so i wonder which part is the BS?

Seems obvious to me. The game can't be as bad as some on here make out if it brings in everything that i mentioned.

Maybe it's just the RL blinkers that come have

the game is awful, its just bred into people, was always a professional sport just the toffs used to use their influence to give jobs that didnt exist and they always had good sponsors. We are still going strong too.

So the only way people like RU is if they've had it bred into them.

Ever thought that people might actually watch it or invest in it because they like the game?

Not a hard choice for blue chip companies. On the one side you have a international game with a strong european club game and on the other side you have SL and it's so called 'characters' like Eddie & Stevo.

can you? The 40% is ana ctual stat for RU, I douby football is due to the quick restart.

ooooh the occasional arrogance of some people on here.
I prefer RL to RU, but I am not so up my own that I do not accept that other people may prefer RU to RL.

Guess what - there are some things that RU offers that we do not. Scrums and Line-outs offer a different dimension that we dont have, having unlimited tackles can make the game very fluid. And the different technical aspects of each of the disciplines means that you get a variety of players from small fast halves to wide props to bean pole locks.

only when we brush the chips off our shoulders and learn to look at our game with neutral eyes will we improve.
We have to start a debate by forgetting whether we have a 'better' game than RU, but we have to make our own game the best it can be regardless.

As the OP has suggested we also have to learn from others where they can provide examples of how to do things better.

This could start by not seeing some tenuous way to have a dig at the RFL on a day out and running back home to jump on the internet and post your opinion to have it validated by other miserable RL fans.

In all seriousness, we really to need to shift the chip off our collective shoulder before our sport can fully reach it's potential.

Perhaps because you are watching through RL coloured spectacles!

Seriously I am no fan of RU but if you are brought up watching it then you probably appreciate it with all it's tactical nuances etc and RL would appear to be the strange game.

Think RL would struggle at Oulton park though -firmly in RU lands!

Seriously though RL does struggle on the publicity side of things, RU has always had a much slicker publicity department (and probably a higher profile amongst the more serious press and TV to be honest - we get stuck with the cloth cap / parochial commentators and pundits). Add in RFLs tendency to shoot itself in the foot quite frequently it is always an uphill struggle.

Yet at grassroots/club level a lot of good stuff does go on - what the RFL needs is a serious shakeup in the publicity department and to spend some money otherwise it will always be a minority sport in this country.