Wigan Warriors 2013 Squad List
1. Sam Tomkins
2. Josh Charnley
3. Darrell Goulding
4. Jack Hughes
5. Pat Richards
6. Blake Green
7. Matthew Smith
8. Epalahame Lauaki
9. Michael McIlorum
10. Lee Mossop
11. Harrison Hansen
12. Liam Farrell
13. Sean O'Loughlin
14. Gareth Hock
15. Ben Flower
16. Chris Tuson
17. Iain Thornley
18. Gimmick
19. Paul Prescott
20. Gil Dudson
21. Scott Taylor
22. Anthony Gelling
23. Logan Tomkins
24. Sam Powell
25. Rhodri Lloyd
26. Dom Crosby

Intteresting.

Hughes looks big favourite for that centre spot.

I'm suprised Lauaki got a squad number in the first 13.

The rumours about Faz getting 12 were true.

The squad has potential but I'd say it's short of a couple of players when it comes to challenging for the big trophies.

Hughes at 4...sigh

Lauaki didn't do enough for me. I'd say that in the props is where we are looking the weakest. Then Hughes at 4?? Who else would we put there though? The only other option would be Gelling. I think it's about time they scrapped the whole 18 - Wigan Warriors fans thing, unless they want to give us a free shirt, free training gear and a chunk of the salary cap?

For me Hughes has pace but not the agility to play 4. Marsh destoyed him there last season as he had good pace and acceleration. Id prefer him in the pack run just inside the centre and use his pace and strength there.

hock numbered 14,is this to do with him maybe wanting to go to the nrl

Rumour is it wasn't him instigating the move

Flower in the pecking order above Prescott and Dudson, Hopefully not playing prop. Our Ben just isn't big enough for the front row.
Crosby at 26 suggests he'll go on loan or DR next season.

Whats happened to Jack Murphy?

Agreed. He looks as good as Joel T and Hansen did early in their career - in the pack!. He has the potential to be an International back row forward IMO.

Instead history is repeating itself and just like Joel T at centre not only does that mean we lack a genuine centre playing 4 it means we miss out on the talents of Hughes in the pack.

It will probably work against weaker opposition but not against the better sides.

Overall I don't think many teams will be frightened of that squad. Too much in common with the squad of 2006 than 2011 or 2012 quality-wise.

Chances are Hughes won't be able to make the team playing as a forward so starting him off at centre seems sensible. As it stands he's the best option in that position until Thornley or Gelling are able to show what they've got to offer.

Just because Hughes is number 4 doesn't mean he won't get an opportunity to play in the pack. After all Thornley has been given number 17 which suggests he's likely to get a decent number of games too.

The squad numbers are usually little more than a reward. Neither Thornley or Gelling performed as well as Hughes did and as Hughes is one of the centre options he got the number 4 shirt.

If he turns out to be the best option at centre after the pre-season games then it's best for him to stay there until someone can force their way ahead of him. He'll still be able to feature in the back row too but it seems the club basically want him playing in the first team and I can't see that as a bad thing.

I agree with the last part though. This isn't a strong squad and it's much more like a step backwards than forwards.

I am sure Wane thinks he's the best option but I don't see how that conflicts with anything I posted about it essentially being a compromise.

I also don't agree he wouldn't get many games in the pack. I reckon in the 2nd row he would already push Faz for a place. Faz is more suited to 13 IMO anyway but he won't get much of a chance there I know but there is just too much compromising going on. Faz isn't really a 2nd row and Hughes isn't a centre.

I like both players and in Hughes I can see that same kind of spark that set Hansen and Joel apart when they first hit the senior squad.

It would be a pity if his potential was hindered or his confidence affected by being played out of position. I don't really see what benefit he will get from playing centre if ultimately he isn't suited to the job.



Not enough players to "scare" the opposition. It will be close Sam down and wind up Hock when he comes on and that is our threats nullified. A lot of responsibility is going to lie with Green to add a third threat as Finch did and Smith has big boots to fill in at 7. Lauaki effectively being the pack leader is just sad compared to recent packs that had front rowers like Coley and Fielden never mind Lima.

Agree with most of this so far. Hughes is a great prospect and I really hope he reaches his full potential. He could develop into a quality centre with the right coaching. Last season we saw numbers left blank for new signings. The absence of the blanks suggests this is it and we have to crack on with what we've got. On paper not as threatening as last season but as they say, RL is not played on paper. Bring on the season!!

I think Faz is just as comfortable at second row as he is at loose forward. He's shown himself to be effective in both positions he just needs to improve his consistency which is nothing unusual for young forwards.

I think Farrell is pretty much nailed on to be ahead of Hughes in the pecking order. Hughes has had some good moments and was excellent against Catalans in France but he's had some ineffectual games too.

The player he was most likely to put pressure on is Tuson but there's no chance that Wane will drop him from his weekly 10 minute spell.

Still, playing in a different position isn't necessarily going to hinder a player. In some cases it can help them. I think in this country we're a little too obsessed with putting players in their places and insisting they never play anywhere else. For Hughes working on his speed and handling should benefit him when playing in the second row. I really don't expect it to be a permanent switch though unless he ends up doing incredibly well there. I think Thornley is still expected to be the long term replacement.

As it stands though Tomkins does seem like our only real attacking threat. Blake Green needs to have a very good year along with Matty Smith because the vast majority of the good things we did in attack last year were down to the organisation and structures involving the halfbacks.

The pack could still be fairly strong in theory but for me it requires Prescott to be fully fit and capable of playing alongside Mossop without one of them getting injured. If Taylor, Dudson and Flower show improvement and Lauaki puts in good performances every week rather than being ridiculously inconsistent then there's still a bit of hope.

I'm not expecting a top four finish though.

Some odd choices, but I guess they're only numbers. I also want to know what happened to Murphy? ETA: Or have they just listed our top 25 on the SC?

Seems a bit harsh on Prescott who imo is still our 2nd best prop after Mossop if everyone is on form, for him to be out of the 17 is silly
Again, Hock has had a great year, and as long as nothing goes wrong (I have no idea what is going on there) he should be starting at 12... he had a much better year than Farrell
Not really convinced on Lauaki as number 8... not sure he was good enough to 'overtake' Precott or Dudson, not even close.
As for Hughes... well I guess if they hadn't put someone in the number 4 there would have been mass speculation that we were signing someone... but I do hope that one of Thornley/Gelling to make that position his own in the season, they are much more natural in the centre position.