Now did the ref give it for donald taking pat out?

If so is it not in the rules that if a kicker is taken off the ball the penalty is taken where the ball lands?

No idea but for the Leeds player in his face we should of had at least 20m!

They gave it for a late tackle on Richards.

Nothing was given for the tackle on Carmont.

Then why was it not where the ball landed?

That was an extra 10 yards ffs

The penalty should have been were the ball stops. Spot on.

Alibert dropped a massive clanger there and maybe cost us the game

He did. True. However not in a month of sundays was that incident a penalty.

But what the hell don't let that fact stop you fookwits crying all week. Enjoy your rant.

Alibert asked the video ref? If it was for the Maguire incident it should have been further back where the incident happened?

How could he give the penalty where the ball stops considering he kicked it into touch?

The only clanger Alibert dropped was awarding the penalty in the first place.

Because it landed in row B of the East stand

If you look it bounced in the field of play doesn't matter if it goes out or not still should have been 10 yard up the pitch

The ball landed in touch, so it had to be from where Donald touched Pat. It was never a penalty, the Carmont one was, but was of no use to us.

No rant here just wanted to see if what i thought was right and it is

I hope mcguire has broke his leg the cheating ****

The ball bounced in play before going out. Also it was a penalty if Donald didnt take Richards out he would of been through.

We'll have to agree to disagree there

Love it!