FORUMS FORUMS



  
FORUMS > Wigan Warriors > Sam & Hudson incident
38 posts in 4 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Pemps
RankPostsTeam
International Board Member32357
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200222 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I'm surprised it hasn't been mentioned, but speaking to few people at todays U20 it seems that many don't appear to know what happened.

Sam, held his arm up to the referee to complain. The referee put the incident on report, alleged biting. If there is sufficient evidence that will be Hudsons last game for Cas.
Lima was furious, and in the next drive went straight for Hudson, who sensibly "got out of the way"

RankPostsTeam
International Star7580
JoinedServiceReputation
May 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Nov 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Didn't really see it tbh. I assumed he just slapped him or something. The verdict will clearly be "insufficient video evidence though".

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach1429No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2015Oct 2015LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I went toilet but my mate was saying some thing about report and biting , that Hudson was housing with Sam soon as he came on off the bench

RankPostsTeam
International Star186No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 201113 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jun 2014Mar 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Hudson was after him all night, every kick chase he was always the first one there trying to put a shot on him. Hudson nearly kicked off with Sam in the first half when Sam was trying to get the ball for a quick play the ball and Hudson wouldn't give him the ball so they gave each other a bit of a push and a few word exchanges. Disgusting behavior if found guilty.

RankPostsTeam
International Star14No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201213 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2012Jul 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Hudson should not have even been on the pitch. After taking performance enhancing drugs he should never have been allowed to play Rugby League. Before people mention Gaz Hock he took recreational drugs.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach456No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2013Oct 2012LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



The dirty sh@thouse pooped his pants when he saw Lima coming towards him, He won`t be missed by RL when he retires a less than average player at the best.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2136No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2015Apr 2015LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: anmills1982uk "Hudson should not have even been on the pitch. After taking performance enhancing drugs he should never have been allowed to play Rugby League. Before people mention Gaz Hock he took recreational drugs.'"



icon_biggrin.gifAISY:

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach6640No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Feb 2013Jan 2013LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: anmills1982uk "Hudson should not have even been on the pitch. After taking performance enhancing drugs he should never have been allowed to play Rugby League. Before people mention Gaz Hock he took recreational drugs.'"


Oh dear.

RankPostsTeam
International Chairman3420
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200123 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Cocaine is a Class A drug, carrying up to 7 years in prison for possession.
Steroids are a Class C drug, which are (as a group), legal for personal use and/or importation.

However, at the risk of people calling me "knobcheese", etc. - I actually agree to a point with the original post.

Within sport, IMO, the use of performance enhancers should carry AT LEAST double the penalty of recreational drug use.

Coke, weed, etc. have no tangible positive impact on a sports professional (other than the possible dulling of pain from impact, but this is massively offset by the reduction in overall physical and mental performance).
Their use, whilst unacceptable, should be TREATED (e.g. 3 month ban, during which the abuser is attend counselling/drying out, with a medical case review before reinstatement).
If the player is then found to have the metabolites in his system for a second time, then an automatic 1 year ban should come in to effect, with the same rules as previously.

However steroids, HGH, etc. must be seen as straightforward CHEATING, which (again IMO) should carry at least the current 2 year ban and I would even look to increase that to 4 years, as in (I believe) athletics.

Additonally, proper random testing MUST be brough in for all players - Not just the England/GB team - with every player being tested at least once per year.
With the most "popular" steroids (at least the most commonly reported ones) seeming to be Stanozolol and Nandrolone, which remain in the system as a metabolite for 3 months (when injected) and 12-18 months respectively, this should give a resonable chance of catching the cheats within a 1-2 year period.
Currently, it appears that that if they stay out of the national team, they can pretty much go undetected for their entire career.

We must do more to dissuade outright cheating, whilst supporting those who may have a problem, and whilst I accept that some people will take the opposing view (as it remains - and always will be - a controversial subject), I think that it is only right to have a more reasoned argument than simply referring to someone as a "knobcheese" and/or "fool", simply because they don't agree with you.

Especially when you are using utterly incorrect facts to back up your end of the argument.

NB - For clarity. I am not currently, nor have I ever been a user of any non-prescription drug bar alcohol and nicotine.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach3169No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200520 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2024Mar 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: anmills1982uk "Hudson should not have even been on the pitch. After taking performance enhancing drugs he should never have been allowed to play Rugby League. Before people mention Gaz Hock he took recreational drugs.'"


icon_lol.gif

The finest example of myopia I've ever seen! Kudos to your fellow fans who quickly ridiculed you- and rightly so!

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach2797No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200816 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2017Oct 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Pie Eyed "
Cocaine is a Class A drug, carrying up to 7 years in prison for possession.
Steroids are a Class C drug, which are (as a group), legal for personal use and/or importation.

However, at the risk of people calling me "knobcheese", etc. - I actually agree to a point with the original post.

Within sport, IMO, the use of performance enhancers should carry AT LEAST double the penalty of recreational drug use.

Coke, weed, etc. have no tangible positive impact on a sports professional (other than the possible dulling of pain from impact, but this is massively offset by the reduction in overall physical and mental performance).
Their use, whilst unacceptable, should be TREATED (e.g. 3 month ban, during which the abuser is attend counselling/drying out, with a medical case review before reinstatement).
If the player is then found to have the metabolites in his system for a second time, then an automatic 1 year ban should come in to effect, with the same rules as previously.

However steroids, HGH, etc. must be seen as straightforward CHEATING, which (again IMO) should carry at least the current 2 year ban and I would even look to increase that to 4 years, as in (I believe) athletics.

Additonally, proper random testing MUST be brough in for all players - Not just the England/GB team - with every player being tested at least once per year.
With the most "popular" steroids (at least the most commonly reported ones) seeming to be Stanozolol and Nandrolone, which remain in the system as a metabolite for 3 months (when injected) and 12-18 months respectively, this should give a resonable chance of catching the cheats within a 1-2 year period.
Currently, it appears that that if they stay out of the national team, they can pretty much go undetected for their entire career.

We must do more to dissuade outright cheating, whilst supporting those who may have a problem, and whilst I accept that some people will take the opposing view (as it remains - and always will be - a controversial subject), I think that it is only right to have a more reasoned argument than simply referring to someone as a "knobcheese" and/or "fool", simply because they don't agree with you.

Especially when you are using utterly incorrect facts to back up your end of the argument.

NB - For clarity. I am not currently, nor have I ever been a user of any non-prescription drug bar alcohol and nicotine.'"


It's a massive grey area that people will never agree on, but this post is pretty much what I think. If someone has taken recreational drugs they have been stupid but if they have been taking performance enhancers they have been actively trying to cheat to gain an advantage over their opponents and should be punished more severely IMO. Like I say you will never get everyone to agree on the matter, some people take the opinion that drugs are drugs and should all carry the same punishment. On the Footy Show last week they were even debating whether painkilling injections should be classed as performance enhancers and also be banned.

I'm not sure you are correct about only England players getting tested though, there is regular post game testing at club level.

adi
RankPostsTeam
Club Owner421
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200321 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Quote: Pie Eyed "Cocaine is a Class A drug, carrying up to 7 years in prison for possession.
Steroids are a Class C drug, which are (as a group), legal for personal use and/or importation.

However, at the risk of people calling me "knobcheese", etc. - I actually agree to a point with the original post.

Within sport, IMO, the use of performance enhancers should carry AT LEAST double the penalty of recreational drug use.

Coke, weed, etc. have no tangible positive impact on a sports professional (other than the possible dulling of pain from impact, but this is massively offset by the reduction in overall physical and mental performance).
Their use, whilst unacceptable, should be TREATED (e.g. 3 month ban, during which the abuser is attend counselling/drying out, with a medical case review before reinstatement).
If the player is then found to have the metabolites in his system for a second time, then an automatic 1 year ban should come in to effect, with the same rules as previously.

However steroids, HGH, etc. must be seen as straightforward CHEATING, which (again IMO) should carry at least the current 2 year ban and I would even look to increase that to 4 years, as in (I believe) athletics.

Additonally, proper random testing MUST be brough in for all players - Not just the England/GB team - with every player being tested at least once per year.
With the most "popular" steroids (at least the most commonly reported ones) seeming to be Stanozolol and Nandrolone, which remain in the system as a metabolite for 3 months (when injected) and 12-18 months respectively, this should give a resonable chance of catching the cheats within a 1-2 year period.
Currently, it appears that that if they stay out of the national team, they can pretty much go undetected for their entire career.

We must do more to dissuade outright cheating, whilst supporting those who may have a problem, and whilst I accept that some people will take the opposing view (as it remains - and always will be - a controversial subject), I think that it is only right to have a more reasoned argument than simply referring to someone as a "knobcheese" and/or "fool", simply because they don't agree with you.

Especially when you are using utterly incorrect facts to back up your end of the argument.

NB - For clarity. I am not currently, nor have I ever been a user of any non-prescription drug bar alcohol and nicotine.'"


Steroids are 80's stuff. If you want to test for HGH or EPO you need to do it a lot more often than once per year as it's pretty easy to mask them. Rugby league, like many other sports, pay lip service to this issue and are happy to brush it under the carpet. Cycling for instance has a biological passport, with the riders profile and numbers on it. Any variance from that and they're out (and they're tested alot!). That's the benchmark here.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach3000No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Nov 2024Oct 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



Drugs used to give you any advantage of your competitor,should carry a big ban than drugs used in recreational use.

At the end of the day its cheating .

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner12006No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 200321 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2019Oct 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



You should be sacked regardless of what type of drug it is.

If I was to be caught under the influence at work then I would be sacked on the spot and would struggle to get another job. Why should someone who happens to be good at a sport be able to take drugs and then return to their job in 2 years or less and carry on as normal? That's before you factor in that they're a role model to Children everywhere who may start to think that drugs are cool because their favourite sportsmen do it.


Gaz Hock has been in superb form this season (my player of the year so far) and I'd rather see him in a Wigan shirt than any other, but IMO he shouldn't have been given another chance.

RankPostsTeam
International Star364No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 201114 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Oct 2017Sep 2017LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
TO BE FIXED



I agree performance enhancers should carry more consequences than recreational though both should be treated with the contempt they deserve.

On topic why do we get this every now and then? Why would a super league player try and bite someone?

I know he is going soon but still, biting? If you mean to damage why not throw a punch or something?

38 posts in 4 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Pemps
38 posts in 4 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Pemps



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


10.490234375:10
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
5m
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
12m
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Mark_P1973
8
28m
Film game
Boss Hog
5752
29m
How many games will we win
alegend
41
48m
2025 Recruitment
paulwalker71
205
49m
Salford placed in special measures
poplar cats
111
56m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Hullrealist
4047
Recent
Pre Season - 2025
Hullrealist
191
Recent
Ground Improvements
Khlav Kalash
192
Recent
Rumours and signings v9
apollosghost
28901
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
28s
Salford
Wires71
53
51s
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
1m
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Mark_P1973
8
1m
2025 Recruitment
paulwalker71
205
1m
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
Hullrealist
4047
2m
Transfer Talk V5
Jack Burton
508
2m
ALL NEW 49ERS ERA LEEDS UTD THREAD
chapylad
2607
2m
New Kit
matt_wire
69
2m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
63266
10m
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
MjM
21
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
2025 Fixtures
Jemmo
1
TODAY
2025 Squad
Sadfish
1
TODAY
Salary Cap Changes Blocked - 11 votes to 1
Mark_P1973
8
TODAY
Fixtures 2025
Bull Mania
9
TODAY
Spirit of the Rhinos
batleyrhino
5
TODAY
Mike Ogunwole
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Bailey Dawson
Wanderer
1
TODAY
2024
REDWHITEANDB
14
TODAY
Dan Norman Retires
Cokey
1
TODAY
How many games will we win
alegend
41
TODAY
Leigh Leopards - 2025 Fixtures
Bent&Bon
6
TODAY
Catalan Away
Dannyboywt1
6
TODAY
2025 Betfred Super League Fixtures
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
2025 fixtures
Smiffy27
15
TODAY
Fixtures
Willzay
13
TODAY
Salford
Wires71
53
TODAY
WCC Off
Choc Ice
11
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS