Havent heard anything about him this off season, was he OOC and has he signed a new deal?

His contract is up as we speak but nothing has been said by the club about his future one way or another as yet. Personally I think he will be released as we have youngsters like Stefan Marsh and Josh Charnley who are on the brink of first team football and play the same positions as Pryce

Cant think of one reason why we would keep him to be fair.

I think he still has something to offer the team, but the lack of news about him is pretty ominous.

For me he's got to be kept. We've put lot of money and resources into the lad and to just release him and possibly waste all that would be a real shame. If he were the difference between us signing another useful addition to the squad next year then I'm sure he'd be shown the door, but the likelihood is he isn't taking up much cap space so probably isn't the difference between us signing another player.

Plus for me his performances have always been decent enough, yes he looks lethargic and lazy but that's just some players style. We've also got to remember that in the not to distant future both Carmont and Gleeson will retire, and the more options and choices we have for replacing those two the better.

Making a well reasoned post about Karl on here?

You're doomed mate.

In regards to how much we've put into him - are we seeing a significant improvement in Karl Pryce to justify keeping him at the club? From my POV, I think we should cut our losses. I haven't seen any gradual improvement from Karl Pryce in his time at the club to warrant keeping him. I feel we have far more promising players at the club who can in the future takeover Carmont & Gleeson - Marsh, Charnley and Goulding prime examples. Also for me, he doesn't just "look" lethargic - he is. Darrell Goulding this season has completely shown him up. One example of this was when Darrell Goulding had a dead leg all strapped up at Leeds and played on & Karl Pryce hobbled off against Saints with seemingly very little - certainly nothing like what Darrell Goulding played on with.

Karl Pryce was a gamble by Ian Lenagan and IMO it hasn't payed off & we should cut our losses.

Goulding has done his job very well this season, but Pryce has scored his share as well. As for the injury example, unless you have the medical detail to hand, im not sure how you can make that statement.

Errm, he's big !

If keeping him will hinder the development of Charnley, Marsh etc then get rid IMO. No room for sentiment.

Absoulutely no point keeping him, Charnley is already better than him.

It's like having a tree on the wing.

Agreedhe is very bone idol and young Charley will do a better job

I think the fact the club told us about Phelps going but not Pryce might suggest something is going on with regard to Pryce. Maybe there negotiating the terms of his contract as a pay per play or something tricky like that.

The club hasnt said anything about Phelps I dont think? From what i've seen it was just what he put on his Twitter and Wigan Evening Post made a story about it.