Is it just me or do any other fans think it is time for Lockers to bow out?, his appearances have been getting less and less every season due to his body getting frail, his performances have also been below par, we can not afford to keep carrying him because of sentiment, look what happened with Scully at Saints, what a joke that turned out to be, come on Sean do the club and fans a favour and call it a day, like your Brother in Law did, it's a good move for everyone, we cut your wage bill, you take up the assistant coach job and get no more injuries, John Bateman takes over your position freeing up a place in the pack and we either promote from within or sign a top NRL player.

It's you.

Definitely you.

So you would be happy to see him get injured after 2 games next season, be out for 3 months in which time we learn how to play without him, only for him to come back into the side and disrupt things to the point we start losing games then after a 4 or 5 game losing streak he gets injured again and we go through the same process having already been dumped out of the Challenge Cup, no ta, not for me, have the decency to call it a day when your body is telling you to.

If he does get injured and has to spend an extended time on the sidelines, then he might decide enough is enough. But I'd rather have half a SOL directing traffic than two Matty Smiths. There's no reason to suppose he's suddenly made of balsa-wood or he'll fold up after 20 minutes on the park.
He's got a lot of stick in the past (especially in the early days, when he was anonymous a lot of the time), but I don't think there are too many more committed squad members in the pack now or in recent years.

(and yes, I suspect it [iis [/ijust you)

There are actually plenty of others, they just won't type it on here in fear of getting chastised by various certain posters and members of the big clique

This is an open forum, not some closed religious sect that stones people to death for not believing in the same book of nonsense they do.

Bring it on. If people want to sack SOL then they're entitled to their opinion and have a perfect right to say so. But if they want to skulk around as nothing more than 5th columnists they'll get short shrift from me a least.

It's definitely the OP.

There are so many "cliques" on here I've lost count who is in which one. Although they only seem to get mentioned when someone doesn't like their opinion being challenged.

Strange as it may seem the props also started to put a shift in when Sarginson was injured, they suddenly realised that they didn't have a back taking the ball up at least once in each set when they were on there own Twenty.

The Cliques are there and they have been there since the first time i joined 10 years ago, it's not just me, others know it as well, some have been banned for questioning them on here, others simply don't post any more because of it, only members of a clique claim that said clique does not exist