Quote: nathan_rugby "I agree, but that isn't what I was quoting.
You said Smith was more important than French - So if you had a choice, you would choose Smith over French?'"
No I didn't. I said he "was more important to the way we play" which he is. Matt Peet says the same thing.
Your questions are nonsense. You're asking if I would choose French/Farrimiond over Smith/Farrimiond. Of course I'd choose the former as Farrimiond is a more natural 7 so that has a far better balance than playing 2 scrum halves.You're asking if I would choose Smith over French. No, because French is the best player in the league. Neither of those questions has any relevance to the statement I made.
If you want something relevant to the statement I made, ask yourself these three questionsway we play?
Nowhere have I said Smith is the better player. He isn't. The two are not the same thing.