Penrith won’t make that mistake again. They will take next year seriously.

Quote Smalls="Smalls"Penrith won’t make that mistake again. They will take next year seriously.'" Comments like this really wind me up and are just a way of dismissing our achievement. They were practically at full strength and you only have to see the footage of their players at the end to realise how seriously they took it. I suggest you read Ivan Cleary's comments here. https://www.theroar.com.au/2023/10/03/c ... r-in-2024/ Just in case you don't bother, I've cut and pasted below “It would be awesome to get another crack at it,” Cleary told AAP. “We were pretty bummed about that one. “We absolutely gave it our best, it was the first game of the year and St Helens were too good for us that night. “It would be nice to get another shot at it.”

Quote Smalls="Smalls"Penrith won’t make that mistake again. They will take next year seriously.'" Comments like this really wind me up and are just a way of dismissing our achievement. They were practically at full strength and you only have to see the footage of their players at the end to realise how seriously they took it. I suggest you read Ivan Cleary's comments here. https://www.theroar.com.au/2023/10/03/c ... r-in-2024/ Just in case you don't bother, I've cut and pasted below “It would be awesome to get another crack at it,” Cleary told AAP. “We were pretty bummed about that one. “We absolutely gave it our best, it was the first game of the year and St Helens were too good for us that night. “It would be nice to get another shot at it.”

I think you are overstating issues in the Saints pack.

Walmsley
Clark
Lees
Sironen
Batchelor
Bell

Knowles
Sione
Delaney
Mbye

We then have Wingfield, Eseh (apparently), Paasi to come back in mid-season hopefully before moving on to younger prospects. We also have back row options (including Whitley) which means Sironen could play prop if needed which he is more than capable of doing.

I know people keep saying Knowles and Sione aren't props, but that doesn't change the fact that they are actually excellent props!

We probably need one more prop but I'm not concerned to be honest, I'm more concerned about us signing a strike outside back.

Quote Stu M="Stu M"Comments like this really wind me up and are just a way of dismissing our achievement. They were practically at full strength and you only have to see the footage of their players at the end to realise how seriously they took it. I suggest you read Ivan Cleary's comments here. https://www.theroar.com.au/2023/10/03/c ... r-in-2024/ Just in case you don't bother, I've cut and pasted below “It would be awesome to get another crack at it,” Cleary told AAP. “We were pretty bummed about that one. “We absolutely gave it our best, it was the first game of the year and St Helens were too good for us that night. “It would be nice to get another shot at it.”'" I agree, it was a cracking game, both teams were giving it their all and it was a great achievement by Saints. Rather than implying they didn't take it seriously last time I would just say that this time around - assuming there even is a WCC, which is never a given - they will be even more fired up, because they will be motivated to put it right.

Quote Stu M="Stu M"Comments like this really wind me up and are just a way of dismissing our achievement. They were practically at full strength and you only have to see the footage of their players at the end to realise how seriously they took it. I suggest you read Ivan Cleary's comments here. https://www.theroar.com.au/2023/10/03/c ... r-in-2024/ Just in case you don't bother, I've cut and pasted below “It would be awesome to get another crack at it,” Cleary told AAP. “We were pretty bummed about that one. “We absolutely gave it our best, it was the first game of the year and St Helens were too good for us that night. “It would be nice to get another shot at it.”'" I agree, it was a cracking game, both teams were giving it their all and it was a great achievement by Saints. Rather than implying they didn't take it seriously last time I would just say that this time around - assuming there even is a WCC, which is never a given - they will be even more fired up, because they will be motivated to put it right.

It's silly to try and decry the Saints win last year. They beat the Aussies on their own soil which is a great achievement.

Just on the Cleary quote though: it's entirely possible to give it your best but be under prepared. Just ask the US Ryder cup team



It's certainly true that they could up there game this time around simply by preparing better or having more warm up games. Whether they will or not remains to be seen. The Aussies still have the attitude that they "only need to turn up" despite history telling a different story.

Quotes after a game are meaningless. He's hardly going to say "yeah, we didn't really train for it", or "to be honest it was a warm-up game and there are bigger prizes later on in the year".

It's pretty obvious they didn't take it as serious as they should and the Saints fans jumping on a quote or two, speaks louder about what they really think than any indignation coming out of their mouths.

That being said, I'm happy they won. But just like the academy GF, I'm not buying into the Saints PR about how it was the test it should have been.

Yeah yeah, and if you win the GF and beat them it will be no achievement either I'm sure.

And yes, it is just like the Academy GF, good point.

By the same token Cleary could easily have just said "yeah we obviously wanted to win, hopefully we'll win it next time" He didn't need to give us the credit he did.

I presume it was nothing like the achievement of Wigan beating Brisbane in 94, no doubt that was held in much higher regard.

Why are you referring to the Academy Final again? We weren't the ones breaking any rules from memory? And if you genuinely think we were running scared of Wigan then you obviously have forgotten that we beat Wigan at Robin Park in April- by a much more convincing scoreline than Wigan's victory over us I may hasten to add.

I absolutely guarantee there'll be Saints fans belittling it should that happen mate. Wouldn't mean they're right though.

Personally, I'd say the two responses in almost quick succession from Stu and FTV kinda proves the point I'm making. It seems to be a sensitive subject for Saints fans that - anything that isn't fawning over them has to be shot down.

I certainly wasn't saying it's not an achievement. It's a very, very good one and one that's up there with the best any British RL club have ever achieved. It's just not this all conquering, best achievement in sport that some of them like to make out. Likewise with the academy GF - parading a trophy around when you didn't beat the team who should have been in the final taints the win. It's an achievement, just not as big of a one you like to make it out to be.

I'd liken the WCC to Buster Douglas beating Tyson. He ended up being the Heavyweight Champion of the World - a massive achievement on its own & one no one can take away from him. He, like this Saints side, will be rightly be remembered as a champion. He wasn't however better than Tyson and if they'd have fought 5 times, it's more than likely likely Tyson would have won 4/5.

Saints aren't the best side in the world. Penrith obviously are. I'm not sure why it bothers Saints fans so much when people say it. Btw if we did the same, I'd be saying the same.

Well I've seen some analogies in my time but thats the best of the lot. Comparing a team currently going for 5 in a row and arguably the greatest team of the SL era to a complete outsider and no hoper as Buster Douglas is incredible. Absolutely incredible.

FWIW I agree that if we played them 10 times, Penrith would win more than us. However given the intensity of their comp and salary cap you'd expect that. They'd also beat any other SL team more times than not.

I'd also argue that a lot of Saints comments on social media are tongue in cheek and aimed at winding opposition fans up.

On your second point and given you can't stop talking about the Academy GF...

Should we not have celebrated? "Sorry lads we can't lift the trophy because we didn't play Wigan, just get changed quickly and go home, see you next season" Thats absolutely laughable.

Again FWIW Wigan were lucky to beat Warrington in the first place and even then only won you could argue due to the extra subs. On a level playing field Warrington may well have won that game fair and square so your obsession in denying 18 year old lads an achievment because of Wigan breaking the rules is equally as incredible as your Buster Douglas analogy.

Your comments are even more remarkable given that you argue with other Wigan fans on here for not giving Saints credit in raising the standards, challenging the MRP, promoting young players etc.