FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
  
FORUMS > Wigan Warriors > Hull KR on Friday
62 posts in 5 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Bilko , Pemps
RankPostsTeam
International Star4469
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 201311 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2023Aug 2023LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
69704_1656949802.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_69704.jpg



It's a conspiracy

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach5360
JoinedServiceReputation
Nov 200618 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2024Jul 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
29557_1715786245.png
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_29557.png



Quote: NickyKiss "I think they’ve been worse than that usually tbh. There is an argument to say the HKR player still has the ball at the first point of contact. Play that at full speed and how can he not make the challenge? The alternative for Ellis is to leave him alone and then what happens if he straightens and goes through the line? He gets pelters and rightfully so.

Just to add some context, I had no issue with that red card in the semi, so this isn’t a moan that we’re being wronged all the time but I just can’t bag Ellis in this case because I think it’s harsh.'"

You were seriously ok with the red card NK? That decision was appalling! You get sent off and banned for someone (literally) head butting your shoulder? There is absolutely no way that could be direct contact to the head. It would have to go against the laws of physics for that to be the case. Utterly incompetent decision.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach29441
JoinedServiceReputation
Nov 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2024Jul 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
10919_1322084665.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_10919.jpg



Quote: Phuzzy "You were seriously ok with the red card NK? That decision was appalling! You get sent off and banned for someone (literally) head butting your shoulder? There is absolutely no way that could be direct contact to the head. It would have to go against the laws of physics for that to be the case. Utterly incompetent decision.'"


I'm trying to word this correctly. I was ok with that decision based on the fact that similar incidents are also seeing players given red cards, so I didn't feel too harshly treated in that regard. Do I think a challenge like that should be a red card? Not in the slightest, in fact I wouldn't even give a penalty for it but we are, where we are and the game is that nervous of litigation, they're going to extreme degrees with any sort of contact with the head. The powers that be seemingly want to do away with the fact that 'accidents can happen' in games and somebody has to pay a price in all incidents. It's wrong, I fully agree but that's the ridiculous place we find ourselves in and as such, I was able to deal with the red card and not think it was an appalling decision by the ref/video ref because it's the position they've been put in and it's not fair on those guys either. What there was no excuse for in that game was Liam Moore freezing in the last 10-15 minutes and deciding to stop making any decisions whatsoever. He may as well have walked off the field on the hour mark.

I look at this Ellis ban and I just think it highlights the absolutely ridiculous position the game is in. People have said Ellis shouldn't have done it but done what? put pressure on from marker and go to make a tackle? It's a tackle that didn't even look late to me but if it was, it was by a fraction of a second. The players aren't robots. I think fans will just turn away from the game if something doesn't happen to change the direction we're going in.

RankPostsTeam
Player Coach5360
JoinedServiceReputation
Nov 200618 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2024Jul 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
29557_1715786245.png
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_29557.png



Quote: NickyKiss "I'm trying to word this correctly. I was ok with that decision based on the fact that similar incidents are also seeing players given red cards, so I didn't feel too harshly treated in that regard. Do I think a challenge like that should be a red card? Not in the slightest, in fact I wouldn't even give a penalty for it but we are, where we are and the game is that nervous of litigation, they're going to extreme degrees with any sort of contact with the head. The powers that be seemingly want to do away with the fact that 'accidents can happen' in games and somebody has to pay a price in all incidents. It's wrong, I fully agree but that's the ridiculous place we find ourselves in and as such, I was able to deal with the red card and not think it was an appalling decision by the ref/video ref because it's the position they've been put in and it's not fair on those guys either. What there was no excuse for in that game was Liam Moore freezing in the last 10-15 minutes and deciding to stop making any decisions whatsoever. He may as well have walked off the field on the hour mark.

I look at this Ellis ban and I just think it highlights the absolutely ridiculous position the game is in. People have said Ellis shouldn't have done it but done what? put pressure on from marker and go to make a tackle? It's a tackle that didn't even look late to me but if it was, it was by a fraction of a second. The players aren't robots. I think fans will just turn away from the game if something doesn't happen to change the direction we're going in.'"

Ah right! I get where you're coming from now and totally agree that the game, refs, players and the clubs themselves are being put in an impossible position at the moment but the element of overreaction is exacerbating the situation in my opinion. The "someone has to pay" to every incident is ruining the game. I can sort of understand the refs getting it wrong but I can't excuse the video refs or disciplinary in the same way. They have time to reason these situations through and are not doing so.

I can understand and accept people making mistakes. I can't accept those mistakes being compounded as they currently are. The sending off and subsequent banning of Joe Shorrocks will add zero to the safety of the game. He'll make the same tackle hundreds of times in the future, and rightly so as he did nothing wrong apart from fail to remove his shoulder from his body so Lewis' head couldn't impact it when it shot forward. Alternatively he could have made sure he was a few inches shorter when he grew up then Lewis' head would contact with his own and it would have been an "unfortunate clash of heads".

Utter madness when you think about it.

RankPostsTeam
Club Coach29441
JoinedServiceReputation
Nov 200420 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2024Jul 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
10919_1322084665.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_10919.jpg



Quote: Phuzzy "Ah right! I get where you're coming from now and totally agree that the game, refs, players and the clubs themselves are being put in an impossible position at the moment but the element of overreaction is exacerbating the situation in my opinion. The "someone has to pay" to every incident is ruining the game. I can sort of understand the refs getting it wrong but I can't excuse the video refs or disciplinary in the same way. They have time to reason these situations through and are not doing so.

I can understand and accept people making mistakes. I can't accept those mistakes being compounded as they currently are. The sending off and subsequent banning of Joe Shorrocks will add zero to the safety of the game. He'll make the same tackle hundreds of times in the future, and rightly so as he did nothing wrong apart from fail to remove his shoulder from his body so Lewis' head couldn't impact it when it shot forward. Alternatively he could have made sure he was a few inches shorter when he grew up then Lewis' head would contact with his own and it would have been an "unfortunate clash of heads".

Utter madness when you think about it.'"


The one thing that I really struggle with is when I watch the NRL and it is chalk and cheese. They're looking for contact with the head, of course they are, but there seems to be leeway to actually be sensible and not think everything automatically has to be a red card and a ban. It's the same sport and the same risk of litigation, so why is it so different? It seems like they are prepared to admit they cannot make the game 100% safe but we are not. I don't know what the answer is but we can't keep going down this path because the game is becoming less enjoyable and we cannot afford for that to be the case.

RankPostsTeam
First Team Player327
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 20204 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Jul 2024Jun 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
78137_1709821937.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_78137.jpg



Quote: NickyKiss "The one thing that I really struggle with is when I watch the NRL and it is chalk and cheese. They're looking for contact with the head, of course they are, but there seems to be leeway to actually be sensible and not think everything automatically has to be a red card and a ban. It's the same sport and the same risk of litigation, so why is it so different? It seems like they are prepared to admit they cannot make the game 100% safe but we are not. I don't know what the answer is but we can't keep going down this path because the game is becoming less enjoyable and we cannot afford for that to be the case.'"


Could that not be explained by the legal action that past players are trying the take again the RFL? I don't think that it is a coincidence that we are seeing similar action and panic against head contact being taken by Rugby Union as they also have past players trying to take legal action against them.

I don't believe that the NRL are having these issues with past players, at least not publically or what i have seen. You could also make the argument that the NRL are far ahead of us when it comes to player safety from contact to the head. The bunker system is always looking out for any level of head contact and players are more frequently brought off the field for a HIA and this is mostly off the back of something seen by the bunker, not the referee. Players who would have probably played on in Super League if involved in a similar contact are going for HIA's in the NRL because the bunker is in place to spot these things.

62 posts in 5 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Bilko , Pemps
62 posts in 5 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
Subscribe | Moderators: Admin, DaveO , Wigan6/Leeds1 Andy , Bilko , Pemps



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


5.0107421875:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
2m
Other Championship Clubs
REDWHITEANDB
234
10m
Planning for next season
LeythIg
13
20m
TV Games - Not Hull
WIZEB
2056
27m
Batley Bulldogs H
Trojan Horse
16
32m
Salford - Away
The games af
22
58m
Leeds
the-bearded-
37
Recent
WHO IS NEXT
ArthurClues
150
Recent
Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE
The Yellow G
2357
Recent
Accountability
Gazzagiant2
1
Recent
Round 16 London Home
chapylad
87
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
48s
Planning for next season
LeythIg
13
53s
Rumours thread
Trojan Horse
1652
59s
This site is crap
tad rhino
3
1m
TV games not Wire
karetaker
3143
1m
Leigh h
apollosghost
60
1m
IMG scores
FIL
32
1m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
37903
1m
Toulouse A
Bull Mania
24
1m
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
KaeruJim
9282
2m
The Seagulls v The Panthers
terry silver
20
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Accountability
Gazzagiant2
1
TODAY
email
orangeman
1
TODAY
This site is crap
tad rhino
3
TODAY
Lucky Leeds Golden Point Win Over the Broncos
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Prettys Girls in your city for night
jackmac452
1
TODAY
Vegas Baby
Jason65
2
TODAY
Wigan Beat Leigh in Derby Thriller
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Reserves
BigTime
2
TODAY
Tonights game v Giants
karetaker
32
TODAY
Free parking
Philth
8
TODAY
Salford Away Travel Information
LancashireRe
1
TODAY
Batley next
Start@1873
3
TODAY
Round 16 London Home
chapylad
87
TODAY
Leeds
the-bearded-
37
TODAY
Injuries and available cover
walter wall
12
TODAY
Problems with this Site continued
karetaker
12
TODAY
3 clubs apply to join League 1
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Sadly one less Bronco
nkpom
2
TODAY
Fan Village
[Gareth]
4
TODAY
The Seagulls v The Panthers
terry silver
20
TODAY
Las Vegas 2025 English ladies involved
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
New halfback signing
Pyrah123
11
TODAY
Batley Bulldogs H
Trojan Horse
16
TODAY
Squads - Leopards v Warriors
Cokey
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Lucky Leeds Golden Point Win O..
152
Wigan Beat Leigh in Derby Thri..
318
Wakefield Trinity Register Thi..
1429
Englands Youngsters Beat Franc..
1111
Big Win for England Women Over..
854
2024 State of Origin - Game 2 ..
1103
New Structure for 2025 Challen..
1203
Super League form rewarded as ..
1525
Superb Salford Complete Histor..
1519
Catalans Dragons Survive Secon..
1519
Warrington Wolves Snatch Late ..
1312
Spirit of Rob Burrow Inspires ..
1526
Hull KR Drop Goal Secures Win ..
1867
St Helens Break Fifty As They ..
1793
Leigh Leopards Resurgence Clai..
1961