Melbourne were up for signing Havard before his injury so he would walk into any team i think that it's just a matter of time before he goes down under and he would rip it up over there

Did Wilkin say that?!

I thought the talk about Knowles being the best player in the league was bad but that is another level

I make a point to keep an eye on him now but I don't see much above what phuzzy is saying. He's good but lockers is an all time great, comparing Knowles to him is crazy.

And yeah, if Havard played for saints wilkin would be saying he's better than Jamie Peacock.

He did. It was something like him waxing lyrical about him and somebody asked if he could get to the level of an O’Loughlin and he commented that he felt he was already past it (or words to that affect).

I rate Knowles very highly but it was a ridiculous comment, that ridiculous I’m not sure if he was being serious or not (although I think he probably was).

**Edit** just watched that bit again and he’s definitely not joking. Will Perry asks if Knowles has the talent to surpass O’Loughlin and says yes and then adds that he’s there already. He said he can do everything O’Loughlin could do and is just as skilful. He is the new Phil Clarke

Did Knowles even play?

Deary me. Here's an idea. Watch some rugby. Learn what it's all about then come back when you actually know something about the game. Lees can't bust his way out of a paper bag these days and LMS is a never has been. Havard is in demand from the NRL. The closest LMS will ever get to it is watching it on TV.

Take a time out mate. You're making a fool of yourself.

of course Knowles could be as good as Lockers if-
He could control a game
He could change a game like Lockers
If he could change position and be as good
if could get the respect of the Aussies
If he could pull out passes only a true legend could
Captain England
Every coach rate him as one of the best players in super league and that he would walk in any club Aussie clubs included.
So yes he could be as good but as Knowles cannot do that as of yet and probably will not the answer would be a NO,not as good never will be.
Havard will be better than Knowles

Watched it again couldnt see Knowles so googled his name all I got was- Missing In Action !!

the thing i took out of the game was the way we closed it out, after taking the lead. Looked like a level of maturity thats building, and if anything we were most likely to score again. Thats what impressed me as much as the way we dominated the 1st half

I don't want to derail a thread by talking about Saints but given this is a Team against Saints thread, I thought it would be better going in here

FWIW, Knowles isn't as good as SOL or Sculthorpe and is some distance off both to be fair. Completely different type of player. I actually think he has been relatively poor this season overall and I'm not quite sure what the reasons are, he seems to be playing less of a ball handling role like the past two seasons and more of a tackling machine and taking drives.

On a different note we are now seeing our worst fears coming home to roost. We went heavy on the salary cap with our halves and we all knew that these were the positions where we had little or no depth. To give Wigan some credit they go the other way and ensure that they always have cover in the halves and will go weaker in the forwards in terms of the cap. Smith, Leulaui, Cust, Field and French can all play in the halves.

We have been extremely unlucky though to have two long term injuries to Lomax and Dodd. I know that Lomax is playing but at what long term cost and at what percentage is he playing to his maximum, only time will tell.

Personally I think Bell will move into the halves and that will be the plan for the season. The only other feasible option is to move Welsby there with or without Lomax and play Bennison at FB which is his natural position. However he is still a young inexperienced lad who has not played many first team games at all. It's a big risk in such a pivotal position.

What’s your thoughts on Lomax playing on? Surely better to get him fully sorted and ready for the back end?

The injury problems Hopoate is suffering aren’t helping Saints. If you could put him in at fullback full time and Welsby in the halves full time, then it would be a no brainer to get Lomax sorted IMO.

I don't understand the decision at all. By protecting him last week it changed our game plan and we suffered. He's a tough lad but I would guess he was at 60% of his max.

I'm wondering if and when Hopoate is fit if they will do what you suggest and decide to get the op done then. It was interesting at Woof's press confernce last week that he took responsibility for bringing Hopoate back too soon so they will definitely air on the side of caution with him now. I don't think he is a great signing at all but he has played FB in both the NRL and for Tonga so can clearly play there. Moreover he was never injury prone in the NRL so he's been a bit unlucky too with first his ribs and now hamstring.

However even if Welsby plays in the halves he still needs someone to partner him and we have no real first choice back up.