Quote: LondonRobster "Some people in WW need to get to the bottom of how we signed a player with what is clearly a potential career ending injury.
This hasn't developed while he's been here, this is a legacy issue.
Am I right in thinking GB was offered around the NRL and no one took him? Yet along we come and we do and he's crocked.
Maybe he's fixable but we should never have got him while in this condition.'"
The story at the time was no NRL clubs wanted to take a risk on him due to the nature of the injury and then he signed with us.
As others have said to me it reads we will support him regardless of what happens, which is absolutely proper and correct, but it does have a negative undertone.
