Quote: The Ghost of '99 "I think this post must be peak post. She wasn't even President, Obama was making the decisions.
But you really should stop this bizarre whatabouttery as to what would have happened had someone else won. On this and almost everything else, your "team" (this appears to be how its viewed on the right now) won, they are in charge and have been for a long time. Make them take some responsibility for the world as it is, not some made-up space in your head where it's all the fault of Clinton or Corbyn, Remainers or woke libs.'"
Very naive of you to think that only 'The President' has a say on matters, if that were the case why didn't Obama go to the meeting? Why send Clinton with the stance of 'We ain't getting involved? then get involved? The article I posted a link to states in her own words just that and that she told Obama to get involved and he did.
Clinton not getting elected took away the opportunity to right that wrong and try and sort things in Libya, if she would have been elected she would have tried to fix her f**k up/sort her legacy and got involved in troops on the ground, it was have been another Iraq.
You say a side is in charge, again, you are very naive in thinking this. The 'right' may have been elected by the people but it's still NGOs who are influencing things on a grand scale, you only need to look at a certain Hungarian billionaire to know how powerful NGOs can be.
Is your username with relation to the year you were born? Genuine question.
