Quote: 100% Warrior "I completely agree with the over coaching and robotic point but from time to time we do see the teams that play with flair and off the cuff such as Cas and more recently St Helens. As much as we may complain about structure and robotics; it’s what won us trophies under both Maguire and Wane. There’s a balance to be found IMO.
I get where you’re coming from re substitutes but not quite sure I entirely agree. I’m for the rolling on/off substitutes to be honest, I have a soft spot for impact players who more often than not are proven to be good game players too.'"
Maybe we have had the wrong balance? Winning trophies and reduced attendances sounds like a oxymoron to me.
Sorry to disagree but I dont in general like "impact" players. If they were any good they would be in the starting 13.
Name me half a dozen great or even really good impact players?
I know that you will name some and im sure they may be decent players but if they are that good why put them on the bench?? Will your list of impact players include any backs?
Multiple substitutions leads to athletes rather than rugby players.