Quote: 100% Warrior "It’s a gamble but it’s a gamble both ways in multiple ways too;
Double Lammy
[iSuccess[/i
He’d be fantastic. An astute move from Rads, IL and Adrian Lam.
[iGone Wrong[/i
We’d be saying things like we do now for SW playing Powell. Adrian Lam would get slated, Rads and IL would come in for criticism and we’d be baying for blood.
Just Head Coach Lam
[iLachlan is an NRL sensation[/i
There would be bloody uproar, why wasn’t he brought here with Adrian and all that jazz. Rads and IL would be torn a new one and Adrian wouldn’t be free from flak.
[iNRL Failure[/i
This is probably the only outcome where no one gets any flak other than why we we considering it.'"
Fantastic. The only time the club's management don't get slagged off - and I'm agreeing with you here, by the way - is when it's a double-negative. In other words, we didn't take a chance and young Lammy didn't turn out to be any good (even though we'd be no better off then than we are now). But this reminds me of lots of bosses I've worked for in the past: do nothing and they can't be criticised for making an error. Thankfully, IL doesn't seem to be cut from that cloth. I live in hope that it'll actually be a double-positive - we take a chance, and Lammy Jnr turns out to be great.