Just putting it out there to see what the thoughts are of how many of the current squad is or isn't good enough? Remember it's each to there own.

Jordan Abdull? Obviously I am biased slightly but he would/will be a cracking loose man

Always looks overweight and unfit. Good hands though.

To be fair the year at rovers did him the world of good he came back hungry confident and a lot trimmer , a step quicker too , on his day he is one of the best but I feel he is very much a confidence player he is very very unlucky with injuries mind , they always seem to be bad ones and long term but he has all the attributes to be top class .

I see some nonsense posted on here but the entire 13 debate takes the biscuit.

Anyone can be a 13 if you get the makeup of the rest of the team right.

The 13 is basically a floating player.

Example, you put a big pack ahead of a skillfull 13 then you can carry him.

Playing roles and responsibilities change with trends and styles of play.

You stick a big aggressive pack ahead of Williams of course he could be a 13.

He could also and in my opinion should have been a 9.

History is littered with 13s who can play 6 or 9 or centre or more recently Prop.

A 13 should be in your top 2 players. His style of play should be dictated by what the rest of the team lacks or requires.

Filter, Hanley, Barrett, Bird, Anasta, Lewis, Tongue, Hinchcliffe, Shorpe, Farrell, Cuthbertson all different players who have played and in some cases been world class in those positions who have also played 13 to a fantastic level in their respective teams as the style of their team required.

I always thought Williams would make a very good 9 - good defensively, well built, good turn of speed and good hands.