He played 15 mins against Lebanon in a spell where we hardly had any ball and about 40 mins against France when he was shifted between stand off, hooker and even centre! He's hardly had enough time to say if he's been good, bad or indifferent (certainly not in his own position).

To put it in to sensible context, he's the only half on tour who hasn't had a start (or even a full half of rugby) in the 6 or 7 shirt.

I do think Hodgson is a good player, and one thing he does have is a very decent kicking game out of dummy half. But Roby has the faster pass, and has been excellent so far. I agree Whitehead has been disappointing, and Currie has certainly out-performed him, even an out-of-position Bateman has looked better. Widdop at full-back (in the Sam Tomkins role, if you will) looked excellent.

Just on Bateman, despite the jibes of "too small", it seems to me he's done OK so far in terms of post-contact metres, much as he does in SL. He should always be worth a place in the 17 in my book.

I posted about his metres on the VT. So far he's made 152m against Australia, 118m against Lebanon and 150m against France. He's doing what he does best and it's not his fault that the specialist aspects of centre play don't come naturally to him.

In comparison Whitehead made around 58m against Australia and about 80m against Lebanon IIRC. Yes he's defending well but that's not good enough for an NRL star.

I hadn't seen that post, but it tallies with the impression I got.

I do think all this flapping over Hodgson 'starting' over Roby is a bit old skool. It was clear in the first test that there will be a 3 way rotation involving the 2 of them and Lockers. Roby of the three is more dangerous against a team starting to show fatigue around the ruck, there isn't a coach around who simply picks his best 13 with the 4 subs as also rans. We looked a genuine threat against the Aussies in the 2nd half with all of them on, there were pivots all across the line.

As many have said, and has unfortunately been obvious, Bateman is a solid workhorse at centre but is regularly guilty of having blinkers on with the ball in hand. In every game at least once he's had his winger in a better position than himself and failed not just to make the pass, but to even look if his winger is there. He can't be blamed for it, out of position, but it's frustrating when both our wingers are up there with the best in their positions in this tournament.

Kevin Brown - he's an easy target for folk citing Wire's shambles last year, but the team looked the most balanced it has been all tournament with him on the field last weekend. You can't ask for players to be picked on form and ignore that. Williams will get plenty of caps over the next few yrs, I have to admit to a bit of relief that he has not been relied on too heavily this early in his career. I genuinely don't think he's ready to shoulder that burden.

Roby was immense off the bench and once PNG have tired themselves out trying batter the English pack, he can come on and mop up. Hodgson just needs to stop trying to be fancy and stick to the gameplan.

Not Brown's biggest fan, but he seems to give Widdop and Gale a bit of space to do their thing, so I don't have a problem with him starting. His kicking game needs to be on point, though.

Williams is still young. He basically wouldn't be at Wigan if they hadn't made him a marquee player - only time will tell whether it was worth it.

The whole Bateman v Percival thing - I just think that Bennett's a bit wary of the size of some of the opposition. He's had ample opportunity to change it and he hasn't. People will just have to lump it for now.