I love the totally unbiased Sky team, if Wigan seemed to have been wronged, it ends up being a very brief discussion followed by a summarisation of, “get on with it, read it in the papers”. On the other hand, if a controversial decision seems to go in favour of Wigan (which it must be said is seldom) there seems to be a judicial inquiry that follows from the so called neutral pundits. And a change to the stated games end review, the Well's epilogue, when Scott Taylor was brought in to give an unbiased point of view on one incident really. To be fair to him, his was actually the least biased opinion of all of them!

Correct. Exactly as the lobbyists at Sky desired. Thanks for making my point for me.

alright orrell lad we,ve stopped cacking ourselves now wigan won,t make the grand final, I was just wondering will you and cruncher and the rest of your keyboard mates making the trip to oz
would be nice to see big following for both clubs

And, of course, voted for by the players themselves.

You have a point even if it is 12 days late. However, since it is the players who vote, who would you think the Sky lobbyists are lobbying? Players' opinions can be swayed too you know.

I'm going with my Dad on the Catalans Sports Tours trip.