As with most debates there are fans on here that take one side and visa versa, this is good. I understand that Solomona has the right to earn more money if presented with the opportunity but 'come on' how can any supporter of any club whatever sport criticise a club for making a rugby based decision. Cas have in the past sold players to stay in business and not take the option of screwing everybody by going into administration - (Clarke) for example.
It was clear from day one what was happening here but because of how it is playing out now, a player being persuaded to retire from the game for money effects every RL club, both in SL and NRL. Every club needs to stand up and lend their support to the RFL to fight this for the good of the game.
Could I quit my phone contract to go on another network and save money.

It'll all end up being Charnley's fault.

Hope so anyway ... then we can get him back sooner than expected, before they do irreparable damage to his ability.

You've gotta laugh!

Of course it's not Charnley's fault (or Solomona's, for that matter), but yes, I do laugh!

I wonder if they have get-out clauses in their contracts in the event of Sale being relegated (unlikely, to be fair)?

I was being ironic ... or trying to.

But even if they have get-outs, I'm not sure Solomona would be welcomed back with open arms.

I realise that; a riff on Sam Burgess etc.

Somehow I don't think Solomona will want to return to SL; as long as he doesn't make a complete Horlicks of his code switch, I expect him to stay in Union.