Quote: catalanglais "Hello Warriors.Congratulations on Saturday's performance.You certainly deserved to win an excellent game.There are 3 points about Escare ,which you might like to consider; 1 In attack he scored 51 tries in his first 52 games and 13 tries in his last 39 games. 2 He is a very bad defender.He cannot tackle,is terrified under the high ball ,is a poor kicker and only a fair passer.There is also his extremely annoying habit of arriving at the scene of a conceded try a second late.3Because of the decline in his attacking form-his defence was always bad- he lost his place in the team before the start of this season.He still was contracted for 2017 and 2018 ,but-and I need to put this very carefully-has allegedly been involved in off field behaviour,which the club will not tolerate.Perhaps he will be a good signing for you,but watching the game right next to Tierney last Saturday I thought that he,while not big enough to break tackles as a winger would be an excellent full back.Finally I must admit that Catalans fans-as distinct from coaches and officials-disagree about Escare.The split is between those who think that the game is all about attacking "gloire" and those who know that if you cannot defend you will lose.So I wish him well,but am glad he is going .Navarette is quite another matter,but that's a different story related to huge salaries for Australians.'"
That's interesting, thanks for commenting, it's always good to have opinions from the fans of club a player is signed from, whether those opinions are good or bad. I think we all already knew about his defensive failings, but we've been able to improve/correct other players with similar faults before.