It frustrated me that Stevo post game likened the Peyroux no decision to the Tierney one saying they were both clearly wrong calls.

Peyroux got that ball down 100% (well maybe 99%) whereas Tierneys call was 60/40 in our favour at worst. They showed two clear images that showed his fingers as inside the line yet Stevo clung to a blurred imagine that had stretched the ball, pitch, white lines and Tierneys hand out of all proportion as evidence that it 'clearly' should have been turned round.

The quality of the image he hung his hat on was as good as a 1970's porno on an old scotch tape he'd just found under his bed.

Look at every still picture. every one shows it in his hand. it slipped towards his waist but it never leaves his control.

Has anyone actually tried watching the game back ? Without the faux outrage ringing in your ears ?
Gidleys was a try , Linehams was a try . Peyroux's was also a try IMO.
But in the first half when Lomax scored , watch the blatant forward pass in the build up

What year did the saints break the salary cap to win the grand final?

I don't think there was match fixing in the criminal sense.
Lineham;s try I can undertsand why they got it wrong.
The Gidley try being awarded was total incompetance. The disallowing of the Peyroux try was far worse than total incompetance.
Has to be two men at the VR screens and the suggesting of a try or no try by the match referee has to stop.

You are nearly so convincing, even for someone that can't spell "understand" (now that is incontinence).

Let it go Ted, let it go there's a big game tomorrow